SuperEx - superex.me

[superextimmy]

#SuperEx #Guide #Kyc

SuperEx is our top choice among no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanges and one of the few platforms that truly provides equal no-KYC trading access for users. Whether you are a high-frequency trader seeking ultra-fast execution or a strategy trader focusing on medium- to long-term trends, you can find strong market depth and a frictionless deposit and withdrawal experience on SuperEx.

• Click to register SuperEx
• Click to download the SuperEx APP
• Click to enter SuperEx CMC
• Click to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

 

Highlights of SuperEx’s No-KYC Policy

1) Registration and Trading Access

Users can access the full trading interface simply by authorizing a Web3 wallet or registering quickly with an email address — no identity verification is required.

2) Diverse Trading Options

SuperEx supports multiple trading products, including:

• Spot trading
• Up to 150x leverage
• Perpetual futures contracts

3) Unlimited Deposits

There are no deposit limits for crypto assets. Users can deposit any amount of cryptocurrency into their accounts at any time.

4) Barrier-Free Withdrawals

Daily withdrawal limits are as high as $1 million, with no KYC requirements.

5) Full Ecosystem Access

All ecosystem features on SuperEx are fully accessible to no-KYC users, including but not limited to:

• 1USD
• Financial wealth management products
• Blind box rewards
• Event rewards
• Free Market
• And more

Limitations of SuperEx’s No-KYC Policy

SuperEx users enjoy completely free no-KYC services with a high level of privacy and 100% asset security. No-KYC users face no policy restrictions when participating in trading or ecosystem activities on SuperEx.

However, if you want to use P2P services on SuperEx, KYC verification is required.

So today, we’ll explain:How to Complete KYC (Web & App)

1. Click on the head icon in the upper right corner of the home page after logging on to www.superex.com and select Identity Verification

 

2.after preparing your ID card, passport or driver’s license, click on the page to go to the authentication.

 

3. Your information will only be used for P2P transactions and will not have any impact on other trading functions of SuperEx, and your information will not be stored on the SuperEx platform.

 

4. Upload a photo of the front and back of your ID and click Continue. Note: Please upload a photo in the required format and ensure that the photo information is clear and legible, without modification or obscuring

 

5. Upload your selfie photo and submit your application

 

The application will be reviewed within 2 days, please pay attention to the review status

 

 

 

[superextimmy]

#SuperEx #EducationalSeries

Have you ever wondered why clearing the same batch of trades at one single price can actually make the market fairer?

In crypto trading, many users are already familiar with one common phenomenon: even when multiple people buy ETH around the same time, the execution prices they receive can still be different. Especially under the AMM model, every single trade changes the asset ratio inside the liquidity pool, which then affects the price of the next trade. The larger the trade size or the thinner the liquidity, the more obvious the price impact becomes.

This is the core nature of a sequential execution market: trades do not happen simultaneously. Instead, they happen one after another, continuously changing the state of the market.

This mechanism is simple and transparent, and it played a major role in helping DeFi grow during its early stages. But it also introduced a problem: transaction ordering itself became something valuable and worth competing for. Whoever manages to get in before or after a certain trade may be able to profit through front-running, arbitrage, or sandwich attacks. In the end, ordinary users are often the ones paying the price through worse execution outcomes.

Uniform Clearing Price was introduced as an important mechanism to help reduce this problem.

The core idea behind it is actually very straightforward: within the same batch, all eligible orders are executed at the exact same clearing price, instead of receiving different prices based on transaction order or execution timing.

At first glance, it may sound like just another pricing rule. But inside DeFi, it is deeply connected to fairness, MEV protection, price discovery, and overall user experience.

• Click to register SuperEx
• Click to download the SuperEx APP
• Click to enter SuperEx CMC
• Click to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

What Is Uniform Clearing Price?

Uniform Clearing Price, often shortened to UCP, refers to a mechanism where all successfully matched orders inside a batch auction are executed at the same market-clearing price.

In traditional auction theory, uniform-price auctions are nothing new. Buyers submit how much they want to buy and the maximum price they are willing to pay, while sellers submit how much they want to sell and the minimum price they are willing to accept. After the auction ends, the system finds a price that allows the highest amount of supply and demand to match. All successful buyers purchase at that same price, and all successful sellers sell at that same price as well.

In DeFi Batch Auctions, the logic works similarly. The protocol collects orders during a specific time window and then calculates a unified clearing result. If multiple users trade the same asset pair within the same batch, they do not receive different execution prices simply because one transaction happened to be ordered earlier than another. Instead, everyone settles at a single unified clearing price.

This is fundamentally different from the traditional AMM model.

Inside an AMM, the first trade changes the pool price, the second trade executes against the updated price, and the third trade changes the price again. Every trade continuously pushes the pricing curve forward. Uniform Clearing Price, on the other hand, attempts to process all orders within the same batch under the same market state, reducing the impact of “who goes first.”

Why Is One Single Price More Fair?

Imagine three users all trying to buy ETH during the same time period. Under traditional sequential execution, the first user may get a lower price, the second user pays slightly more, and the third user pays even more. But economically speaking, these users may not be meaningfully different at all. The only difference is transaction ordering.

In an on-chain environment, this ordering difference may not even come from user behavior itself. It can be influenced by gas settings, node propagation speed, mempool visibility, block builders, and validator decisions. Ordinary users have very little control over these infrastructure-level details.

This is exactly where Uniform Clearing Price becomes valuable.

It treats all orders within the same batch as part of the same market event. As long as the orders satisfy the execution conditions, everyone faces the same clearing price. The final result becomes much closer to a genuinely fair market price, instead of being the outcome of an ordering game.

For users, this greatly reduces information asymmetry. You no longer need to constantly worry about being a few milliseconds slower and ending up in a worse execution position. You also do not need to fully understand complex mempool games. You simply define the conditions you are willing to accept, and the system handles clearing at the end of the batch.

How Does Uniform Clearing Price Reduce MEV?

Many MEV-related problems fundamentally rely on transaction ordering differences.

Take a sandwich attack as an example. An attacker notices that a user is about to buy a token, so the attacker buys first and pushes the price higher. The user is then forced to execute at a worse price. Afterward, the attacker sells the token and locks in profit. The entire strategy depends on exploiting the price difference between the transaction before and after the victim’s trade.

Uniform Clearing Price weakens this opportunity.

Because orders within the same batch are settled at one unified price, the ability to profit simply by inserting transactions before or after another user becomes much more limited. Transaction ordering no longer directly determines each user’s final execution price, making it harder for attackers to extract value purely through reordering.

A well-known example is CoW Protocol. According to CoW DAO, CoW Protocol uses batch auctions and solver competition to search for the most optimal settlement solution. Within each batch, it applies uniform clearing prices to help reduce front-running and sandwich attack risks. It also leverages Coincidence of Wants, where users’ trading needs naturally match one another, reducing dependence on AMM liquidity pools.

Of course, Uniform Clearing Price does not mean MEV disappears completely. More accurately, it reduces the MEV generated by ordering differences inside a batch. Competition shifts away from “who can cut in line first” toward “who can produce the best settlement outcome.”

What Is the Relationship Between Uniform Clearing Price and Batch Auctions?

Uniform Clearing Price usually does not exist independently. In most cases, it is one of the core components inside a Batch Auction system.

Batch Auctions are responsible for collecting orders together, while Uniform Clearing Price determines the price at which those orders are executed. Only when these two mechanisms work together can the market behave differently from traditional one-by-one execution models.

If orders are merely collected in batches but still executed sequentially at different prices afterward, then the fairness advantage of batch auctions becomes much weaker. But once all eligible orders inside the same batch clear at one unified price, transaction ordering becomes far less important, and the market focuses more on overall supply, demand, and settlement efficiency.

Inside Frequent Batch Auctions, this concept goes even further. The market continuously repeats batch auctions at very short intervals, with every batch settling at a unified clearing price. This preserves a near real-time trading experience while reducing unfair competition driven by millisecond-level speed advantages.

That is also why Uniform Clearing Price is frequently discussed together with Batch Auctions, Frequent Batch Auctions, and Solver Networks. Together, they form an important execution framework inside Intent-based DeFi:

Users express trading intent, orders enter a batch, solvers compete to find the best settlement path, and the final execution is completed through unified clearing rules.

A Simple Example

Imagine a batch where several users want to buy ETH, while several others want to sell ETH. Buyers are willing to pay different prices, and sellers are willing to accept different prices.

The system sorts buy orders from highest to lowest and sell orders from lowest to highest, then finds the point where supply and demand match. The price at that point becomes the clearing price. Orders willing to trade at that price or better conditions are executed, while the rest remain unfilled.

This means a buyer who was originally willing to pay a much higher price may not actually end up paying that maximum amount. If the final clearing price is lower, the buyer receives a better outcome. Similarly, a seller willing to accept a lower price may still sell at the higher unified clearing price.

This is one of the user-friendly aspects of Uniform Clearing Price: it encourages users to express their real constraints honestly while allowing the broader market supply and demand to determine the final execution price. Users no longer need to absorb excessive risk caused by transaction ordering, routing complexity, or execution details.

What Are the Limitations?

Of course, Uniform Clearing Price is not a perfect solution for every scenario.

First, it relies heavily on sufficient order density. If there are too few orders inside a batch, the supply-demand curve may not be meaningful enough, and the advantages of unified clearing become less obvious. The more active the market is, the more efficient batch clearing tends to become.

Second, it requires extremely careful mechanism design. Batch duration, order prioritization, partial fills, solver competition, settlement verification, and execution rules can all significantly affect the final outcome.

Third, it is not ideal for every trading environment. For extremely small trades or situations where instant execution matters more than anything else, traditional AMMs may still offer a more direct experience. However, for large transactions, MEV-sensitive trading, cross-liquidity execution, and intent-based trading, Uniform Clearing Price can provide much stronger advantages.

Final Thoughts

Uniform Clearing Price represents a fundamentally fairer market design philosophy: same batch, same asset, same price.

It reduces meaningless competition over transaction ordering and brings execution results closer to real market supply and demand, instead of letting infrastructure speed determine winners and losers.

As DeFi continues evolving from early experimentation toward a more mature financial system, better trading mechanisms will become increasingly important. Because what ultimately defines user experience is not just whether opportunities exist in the market, but whether users can access those opportunities through a fair, transparent, and reliable execution process.

Uniform Clearing Price is not merely a technical detail. It is one of the key building blocks for a more mature, more efficient, and more user-friendly on-chain market.

This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.

 

[superextimmy]

#SuperEx #EducationalSeries

Today, let’s talk about something that may completely change the way many people think about trading.

In most users’ minds, a trade feels incredibly simple. After all, it happens every single day, almost like buying a slice of pizza.

• Click Buy
• Click Sell
• Trade completed

The entire process often takes less than a second.

But in reality, the moment a user clicks that button, an extremely complex chain of systems immediately begins working together behind the scenes.

And at the center of all of it is one of the most important pieces of infrastructure inside any exchange:

The Order Matching Engine.

It determines:

• Who gets filled first
• What execution price is used
• Whether the market is fair
• Whether high-frequency trading strategies can function properly
• Whether the system remains stable during extreme volatility

You could even say that one of the clearest reflections of an exchange’s real technical strength is its matching engine.

Many people focus on an exchange’s brand, marketing campaigns, listed assets, or trading fees. But the thing that truly shapes the trading experience is often the underlying infrastructure users never actually see.

And that is exactly why, in professional trading markets, matching performance has always been one of the fiercest battlegrounds between exchanges.

• Click to register SuperEx
• Click to download the SuperEx APP
• Click to enter SuperEx CMC
• Click to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

What Is an Order Matching Engine?

Simply put, the job of a matching engine is to connect buyers and sellers inside the market.

For example:

• User A wants to buy BTC at 100 USDT.
• User B wants to sell BTC at 100 USDT.

The matching engine identifies that:

• The prices match
• The quantity conditions are satisfied

The system then automatically completes the trade.

That is the most basic form of order matching.

At this point, you might think: “Wait… this sounds pretty simple. Does this really need an entire educational article?”

Don’t rush.

Because real-world markets are far more complicated than this simplified example.

Inside an actual exchange:

• Hundreds of thousands of order requests may arrive every second
• Prices constantly change in real time
• Users come from all over the world
• Large numbers of bots and HFT systems operate simultaneously
• Market depth changes continuously
• Order types become extremely complex

As a result, a truly mature matching system behaves less like a simple trading tool and more like an ultra-high-speed, low-latency, real-time financial operating system.

The logic itself is not necessarily complicated.

What becomes complicated is the massive scale and constantly changing market environment.

Why Is the Matching Engine So Important?

Many people believe the most important thing for an exchange is asset security. And yes, security absolutely matters.

But for a trading platform:

• Security determines the lower limit
• Matching capability determines the upper limit

Because the core of every market is liquidity. And the essence of liquidity is whether orders can be executed quickly, efficiently, and fairly.

So what happens if matching efficiency becomes too weak?

For example:

• Orders fail to execute properly
• Massive slippage appears
• Candlestick charts behave abnormally
• High-frequency strategies stop functioning
• Extreme market conditions cause lag
• “Wick manipulation” becomes more severe

Especially in crypto markets, where trading runs 24/7 and volatility is extremely high, there are moments when total market order volume can suddenly surge dozens of times higher within seconds.

At that point, what truly tests an exchange is not its normal operational ability, but whether the system can still perform real-time matching under enormous pressure.

This is also why, during every major bull market or extreme volatility event, some platforms inevitably experience:

• System outages
• Severe latency
• Failed order cancellations
• Abnormal liquidations
• Frozen APIs

At the core, many of these problems ultimately point back to the same issue:

The matching system became overloaded.

How Does a Matching Engine Actually Work?

Most centralized exchanges (CEXs) use a system called the Central Limit Order Book, commonly known as the LOB (Limit Order Book).

It continuously records:

• Buy orders
• Sell orders
• Order quantities
• Prices
• Time priority

The system then performs matching according to predefined rules.

For example:

Current buy orders:

• 100 USDT — 1 BTC
• 99 USDT — 2 BTC

Current sell orders:

• 101 USDT — 1 BTC
• 100 USDT — 1 BTC

When a seller places an order at 100 USDT, the system will prioritize matching against the best available buy order first.

This is known as Price-Time Priority, one of the core rules used by most modern exchanges.

It means:

• First priority: Better price
• Second priority: Earlier arrival time in the order book

This mechanism helps maximize market fairness.

At this point, some people may ask:“If blockchain emphasizes decentralization, why are matching engines still difficult to decentralize? Why do most high-performance exchanges still rely on centralized matching?”

The answer is actually very simple:Blockchains themselves are still relatively slow.

For example:Traditional high-performance matching engines may achieve:

• Sub-1 millisecond latency
• Hundreds of thousands of orders processed per second

Meanwhile, most on-chain systems still face:

• Multi-second block confirmation times
• Limited TPS
• High state synchronization costs

If order matching were fully placed on-chain, the system would immediately face:

• Massive latency
• High transaction costs
• Insufficient throughput

This is also one of the main reasons why most DEXs rely on AMMs instead of traditional order book matching systems.

AMMs Are Changing Traditional Matching Logic

Although traditional order books still dominate most mainstream trading platforms, AMMs (Automated Market Makers) have gradually changed the market’s understanding of liquidity over the past few years.

In traditional markets, liquidity is usually provided by professional market makers. They continuously place buy and sell orders to maintain market depth and profit from the bid-ask spread.

But AMMs introduced a completely different idea:Ordinary users themselves can become liquidity providers.

Instead of relying on manual order matching through order books, AMMs automatically calculate prices using algorithmic formulas.

The most famous example is:x \cdot y = k

Users can inject assets into liquidity pools, provide market liquidity, and earn a share of trading fees in return.

This model was widely adopted throughout the DeFi ecosystem by platforms such as Uniswap, SushiSwap, and Curve.

However, pure AMM systems still have limitations, including:

• Large trade slippage
• Low capital efficiency
• Price deviations during extreme volatility
• Unstable liquidity depth

As a result, more and more platforms are now exploring Hybrid Models that combine AMMs with Order Books.

In this architecture:

• AMMs provide baseline liquidity
• Order books improve price discovery and matching efficiency

For example, SuperEx’s Free Market AMM adopts a combined AMM + Order Book structure.

The system automatically converts liquidity pool depth into order book depth, preserving the open liquidity advantages of AMMs while also maintaining the matching efficiency typically associated with centralized exchanges.

Compared with traditional market-making systems, this design significantly lowers the barrier to becoming a liquidity provider. Ordinary users no longer need complex API configurations or professional market-making teams. Instead, they can simply contribute assets into liquidity pools, participate in market liquidity construction, and earn a share of trading fees.

In many ways, this may represent one of the future directions of trading infrastructure evolution:

Making market liquidity no longer exclusive to professional institutions.

Why Is Low Latency So Critical?

Inside trading systems, there is one extremely important metric: Latency.

Latency measures how long it takes for an order to travel from submission to execution.

For example:

• 1 millisecond
• 500 microseconds
• 50 microseconds

For ordinary users, a difference of several milliseconds may not feel meaningful.

But for professional trading firms, that tiny difference can determine:

• Profit
• Loss
• Failed arbitrage opportunities
• Failed liquidations

Especially in high-frequency trading (HFT), speed itself becomes a competitive advantage.

That is why major global exchanges continuously optimize:

• Network transmission
• Memory processing
• CPU scheduling
• Data structures
• Parallel architectures

And even:

• Physical server distance
• Fiber-optic routing
• FPGA hardware acceleration
• Kernel-level optimization

Because in highly competitive markets, even “1 microsecond faster” can create enormous advantages.

Final Thoughts

For ordinary users, the traditional matching engine is often invisible.

But in reality, it determines whether the entire trading market can truly operate efficiently.

In some sense, the true nature of an exchange is not merely an asset platform.

It is a real-time global financial computing system.And the matching engine is the true heart of that system.

 

[superextimmy]

SuperEx is our top choice among no-KYC cryptocurrency exchanges and one of the few platforms that truly provides equal no-KYC trading access for users. Whether you are a high-frequency trader seeking ultra-fast execution or a strategy trader focusing on medium- to long-term trends, you can find strong market depth and a frictionless deposit and withdrawal experience on SuperEx.

• Click to register SuperEx
• Click to download the SuperEx APP
• Click to enter SuperEx CMC
• Click to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

Log in to the SuperEx App, click on the profile picture in the upper left corner to enter the user center, and locate the identity verification option in the personal homo sapiens information. 

Prepare your ID card, passport, or driver’s license, and click to proceed with verification.

Your information will only be used for P2P trading and will not have any impact on other trading functions of SuperEx.

Upload a photo of the front and back of your ID and click Continue. Note: Please upload a photo in the required format and ensure that the photo information is clear and recognizable without modification or obscuring.

Upload your selfie photo and submit your application

The application will be reviewed within 2 days, please pay attention to the review status.

 

[superextimmy]

#SuperEx #Guide #P2P

Buying cryptocurrency on the SuperExP2P platform requires the following steps:

Step1：Visit the SuperEx P2P trading platform: SuperEx P2P Platform

Step 2: Select the cryptocurrency you want to purchase, the fiat currency you want to use for the transaction, and your preferred payment method.

Step 3: Choose an advertisement with a price you find suitable, then click “Buy.”

Step4: Enter the amount or quantity you wish to purchase and confirm the order.

Step 5: Complete the payment within the required time limit.
 (Note: You must transfer the funds directly to the seller through a third-party payment platform using the payment details provided by the seller. If you have already transferred the funds to the seller, please do not click “Cancel Order” unless the seller has already refunded your payment account. If you have not completed the payment, please do not click “Paid,” as this violates the trading rules.)

Step 6: After confirming payment, wait for the seller to release the crypto.

Step 7: Once the seller releases the crypto, the transaction is completed.

Points of Attention

Transaction restrictions.

1. The order cannot be lower than the minimum order amount set in the merchant;

2. The order cannot be higher than the maximum order amount set in the merchant;

3. The order can not exceed the limit;

Order restrictions.

1. The order cannot be placed for more than 45 seconds.

2. Users cannot make more than 2 orders at the same time.

 

[superextimmy]

#SuperEx #EducationalSeries

There is a very interesting phenomenon in the crypto market.

Almost every new user, at some point, will say something like this: “Why does trading on-chain feel so different from trading on other centralized exchanges?”

Did you say such things?

• Sometimes the price slips hard.
• Sometimes the chart moves, but your order never fills.

l And sometimes, two people buying at nearly the same moment somehow end up with completely different execution prices.

At first, many users assume this is simply because “the blockchain is slower.”

But the deeper reason is actually much more fundamental: In many cases, the underlying trading logic itself is completely different.

Yesterday, we talked about the matching engine and how traditional exchanges rely on order matching systems to connect buyers and sellers.

We also mentioned that SuperEx’s Free Market AMM introduces a hybrid structure that combines AMM mechanisms with order book models.

Today, we continue from there.

Because to truly understand why hybrid trading models matter, you first need to understand one thing:

What exactly is an On-chain Order Book?And more importantly: Why has building one always been much harder than people imagined?

• Click to register SuperEx
• Click to download the SuperEx APP
• Click to enter SuperEx CMC
• Click to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

 

Most People Think “Order Book” Is Just a List of Orders

Technically, that’s true.

But in reality, an order book is far more than a list.

It is the core infrastructure behind how markets discover prices.

• Every buy order.
• Every sell order.
• Every limit order waiting in the market.

All of them exist inside the order book. When buyers and sellers agree on a price, trades happen.

Simple in theory.

Extremely difficult on-chain.

Because traditional order books were originally designed for high-speed centralized systems.Not public blockchains.

In Centralized Exchanges, Everything Happens Inside One Engine

On traditional stock exchanges, the matching engine controls everything internally.

The exchange can:

• Instantly update orders
• Cancel orders in milliseconds
• Process thousands of transactions per second
• Keep fees extremely low
• Synchronize market data in real time

This is why centralized order books feel smooth.

Almost effortless：You click→The order executes→Done.

Most users never even think about the infrastructure behind it.But on-chain trading changes the entire environment.

Because suddenly: Every action becomes a blockchain transaction And that changes everything.

Imagine Paying Gas Just to Modify an Order

This was one of the earliest problems faced by on-chain order book systems.

In a traditional exchange，Changing an order is trivial.

But on-chain?

Even modifying or canceling an order may require:

• Wallet signatures
• Blockchain confirmation
• Gas fees
• Waiting for block inclusion

Now imagine high-frequency traders operating like this — It becomes almost impossible And this is exactly why early DeFi protocols moved toward AMM models instead.

Because AMMs removed the need for traditional market makers to constantly place and adjust orders.

• Liquidity came from pools.
• Pricing came from formulas.
• At the time, this was revolutionary.

Actually, without AMMs, DeFi probably would not have exploded the way it did in 2020.

But over time, new problems appeared.

Professional traders started realizing that AMMs were excellent for accessibility…

But not always ideal for precision trading.

The Problem With Pure AMM Systems

AMMs are efficient.But they are not perfect.Especially during volatility.

In pure AMM environments, users often face:

• Slippage
• Impermanent loss
• Poor large-order execution
• Weak price depth
• Less precise control over execution prices

This is why professional trading platforms still heavily rely on order books.Because order books provide something AMMs struggle to replicate:Direct price intention from real market participants.

In other words:An order book reflects what traders actually want.

Not just what a formula calculates.That distinction matters more than many people realize.

So Why Didn’t Everyone Build On-chain Order Books Earlier?

Because blockchains were never originally optimized for them.This is the key point many newcomers miss.

Order books require:

• High throughput
• Low latency
• Frequent updates
• Massive data processing

But public chains traditionally prioritize:

• Decentralization
• Security
• Transparency

Not ultra-fast trading performance.That creates natural friction.

For years, this became one of the biggest debates in DeFi:Can fully on-chain trading ever compete with centralized exchanges?And honestly, for a long time, the answer was “not really.”

At least not at scale.

Then Hybrid Models Started Appearing

This is where things became interesting.

Instead of forcing markets to choose between AMM or Order Book systems…

Some platforms began combining both.

Because the industry slowly realized something important: AMMs and order books are not necessarily enemies.They solve different problems.

AMMs are great for:

• Permissionless liquidity
• Accessibility
• Simplicity
• Long-tail assets

Order books are great for:

• Precise execution
• Professional trading
• Deep liquidity visibility
• Advanced trading strategies

Combining them started making more sense than forcing one model to replace the other entirely.And this is exactly why hybrid structures have become one of the most important directions in modern exchange design.

Why Hybrid Trading Models Matter

The idea behind hybrid systems is actually very practical.

• Instead of relying only on liquidity pools…
• Or relying only on traditional order matching…

The system can utilize both mechanisms together.

This allows platforms to potentially achieve:

• Better liquidity efficiency
• More flexible execution
• Improved market depth
• Reduced slippage
• More stable pricing environments

In SuperEx’s Free Market AMM structure, this combination is part of a broader attempt to improve how decentralized trading environments function under real market conditions.

Because ultimately, markets are not theoretical systems.

• They are emotional.
• Chaotic.
• Fast-moving.
• And sometimes irrational.

A trading infrastructure that works during calm conditions but collapses during volatility is not enough anymore.The industry is evolving beyond that.

The Future of On-chain Trading May Not Be “AMM vs Order Book”

Ironically, one of the biggest lessons from DeFi is this:The market rarely evolves in absolutes.

• For years, people argued:“AMM will replace order books.”
• Then others argued:“Order books are the only professional solution.”

But reality is turning out to be much more nuanced.

The future may belong to systems capable of integrating multiple liquidity mechanisms together.Not choosing only one.

Because at the end of the day, users do not really care whether liquidity comes from:

• a pool，
• a market maker,
• or an order book.

They care about one thing:Can they trade efficiently?And that single question is quietly reshaping the architecture of modern crypto exchanges.

 

 

[superextimmy]

#SuperEx #EducationalSeries #blockchain

Guys, today we’re talking about something that sounds painfully technical at first: Off-chain Matching / On-chain Settlement.

Yeah, I know.

It sounds like the kind of phrase someone would drop in a whitepaper right before everyone quietly closes the tab.

But stay with me, because this idea actually explains one of the biggest questions in crypto trading:How can a trading platform be fast, cost-efficient, and still keep the trust advantages of blockchain?

That answer often starts here.

The Problem: Blockchains Are Powerful, But Not Always Fast

Let’s be honest.

Blockchains are amazing because they are transparent, verifiable, and difficult to tamper with. But when it comes to trading, they can also feel slow and expensive.

If every order, cancellation, price update, and trade execution had to happen directly on-chain, the experience could become painful very quickly.

• You place an order.
• You wait for confirmation.
• Gas fees move around.
• The market moves faster than your transaction.
• Not exactly ideal.

Trading needs speed. Prices change in seconds. Sometimes in milliseconds. So the industry started asking a very practical question:What if we handle the fast-moving part off-chain, but keep the final asset settlement on-chain?

That is the basic idea behind Off-chain Matching / On-chain Settlement.

• Click to register SuperEx
• Click to download the SuperEx APP
• Click to enter SuperEx CMC
• Click to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

Off-chain Matching: The Fast Part Happens Off-chain

Matching simply means connecting buyers and sellers.

• You want to buy.
• Someone else wants to sell.
• The system matches the two orders based on price, amount, and order priority.

In an off-chain matching model, this matching process does not happen directly on the blockchain. Instead, it happens in a high-performance off-chain system.

Why?

Because order books move fast.

Traders place orders, cancel orders, adjust orders, and react to market changes constantly. If every one of those actions required an on-chain transaction, the system would become slow, expensive, and difficult to use.

Off-chain matching allows the platform to process orders quickly, more like a traditional exchange experience.

In simple terms: Off-chain matching is built for speed.

On-chain Settlement: The Final Result Goes Back On-chain

Now you might be thinking:“Wait. If matching happens off-chain, doesn’t that just make it centralized?”

Fair question.

That is why the second half matters: on-chain settlement.

The matching engine may decide which orders are matched, at what price, and in what quantity. But the final settlement, meaning the actual confirmation of asset movement or trade results, is handled on-chain.

So the division is simple:

• Matching happens off-chain for efficiency.
• Settlement happens on-chain for trust and verification.

Think of it like a restaurant.

Ordering food, changing your order, asking for water, and checking what is available can all happen quickly and casually. But when the bill comes, the numbers need to be final and clear.

• Off-chain matching is the fast conversation.
• On-chain settlement is the final bill.

Why This Model Matters

This model tries to combine two things the crypto industry has always wanted at the same time:

• The speed of centralized systems.
• The transparency of blockchain systems.

Centralized exchanges are usually fast and smooth. But users must trust the platform’s internal records.

Fully on-chain systems are more transparent, but they can be slower and more expensive, especially during network congestion.

Off-chain Matching / On-chain Settlement sits somewhere in the middle.

It says:Not every action needs to be written to the blockchain immediately. But the important final result should be verifiable on-chain.

That balance is why this architecture is used or discussed in many hybrid exchanges, Layer 2 systems, derivatives platforms, and advanced trading infrastructures.

A Simple Example

Imagine Alice wants to buy 100 USDT worth of a token. Bob wants to sell that token.

In a fully on-chain model, Alice’s order may go on-chain, Bob’s order may go on-chain, and the trade execution may also require on-chain confirmation.

That can work, but it may be slower and more expensive.

In an off-chain matching / on-chain settlement model:

• Alice submits her order to the trading system.
• Bob submits his order to the trading system.
• The platform matches them off-chain.
• The final trade result is settled or recorded on-chain.

From the user’s perspective, the trade feels faster.

From the blockchain’s perspective, the final outcome remains verifiable.

That is the key.

Off-chain Does Not Mean “Hidden in the Dark”

A lot of people hear “off-chain” and immediately get suspicious.

And honestly, that instinct is not completely wrong. In crypto, you should always ask where trust is coming from.

But off-chain matching does not automatically mean something shady is happening. In a well-designed system, off-chain matching is used to improve performance, while on-chain settlement helps preserve accountability.

The important questions are:

• Can users verify the final result?
• Are settlement rules clear?
• Is there a smart contract involved?
• How are disputes or abnormal situations handled?
• Can the platform prove that trades were settled correctly?

Different platforms may use different designs, such as signed orders, smart contracts, batch settlement, proofs, or Layer 2 mechanisms.

You do not need to memorize every technical term.

Just remember this:

• Off-chain matching is about efficiency.
• On-chain settlement is about final trust.

Why Should Regular Users Care?

Because architecture affects your trading experience.

You may not care how the engine works under the hood, but you definitely care about what it does to your trading.

• You care whether orders are fast.
• You care whether fees are reasonable.
• You care whether settlement is reliable.
• You care whether your assets are handled transparently.
• You care whether the platform can perform during market volatility.

That is why this concept matters.

It is not just a technical detail. It shapes the user experience and the risk model of the platform.

Once you understand it, you stop judging exchanges only by surface-level claims like “fast” or “secure.”

You start asking better questions:

• Fast because of what?
• Secure in which part of the process?
• Where does matching happen?
• Where does settlement happen?
• What can I verify on-chain?

That is a much smarter way to look at trading infrastructure.

Where Is This Model Useful?

Off-chain Matching / On-chain Settlement is especially useful in trading environments that need high performance, such as:

• Order book exchanges
• Perpetual futures platforms
• Derivatives trading
• High-frequency trading systems
• Layer 2 trading protocols
• Hybrid CEX/DEX models
• Markets with frequent order placement and cancellation

In highly volatile markets, speed matters.

No one wants to submit a trade and then sit there watching a wallet confirmation spin while the price runs away.

We have all seen enough of that movie.

But It Is Not Magic.Let’s be clear.

Off-chain Matching / On-chain Settlement is not a perfect solution to everything.

It improves speed and efficiency, but it also requires strong system design.

For example:

• Is the off-chain matching engine fair?
• Can order priority be trusted?
• Is settlement timely?
• What happens during extreme volatility?
• Can users verify that the final results are correct?
• Are there protections against manipulation or delays?

These questions matter.

A platform should not just throw around technical terms and expect users to be impressed. The real value comes from transparent rules, reliable settlement, and strong risk controls.

In crypto, fancy architecture is only useful if it actually protects users and improves the experience.

Final Thoughts

Off-chain Matching / On-chain Settlement can be summed up in one sentence:

The fast order-matching process happens off-chain, while the final settlement happens on-chain.

Its value is simple:

• Faster trading
• Lower on-chain pressure
• Better user experience
• More efficient order processing
• On-chain confirmation for final settlement
• A balance between performance and transparency

So the next time you see a platform mention Off-chain Matching / On-chain Settlement, do not let the phrase scare you away.

Just think of it like this:The trading engine moves fast off-chain, but the final result lands on the blockchain.

That is the beauty of the model.

• Fast where speed matters.
• Verifiable where trust matters.

 

[superextimmy]

#SuperEx #EducationaSeries #RFQ

Guys, today we’re going to tak about a trading mechanism that sounds ike it beongs in a Wa Street back office:RFQ. Request for Quote.

I know, it sounds dry. ike something hidden inside a finance textbook that nobody opens uness there’s an exam tomorrow.

But here’s the twist: RFQ is actuay one of the ceanest ways to understand how serious traders get prices before making a move.And in crypto, especiay when trades get arger, more compex, or more sensitive to sippage, RFQ becomes a very important too.

https://news.superex.com/articles/34764.html

First, What Is RFQ?

RFQ stands for Request for Quote.In simpe anguage, it means:A trader asks one or more iquidity providers for a specific price before executing a trade.

Instead of bindy pacing an order into the open market, the trader says:“I want to buy or se this asset, in this amount. What price can you give me?”

Then market makers or iquidity providers respond with quotes.The trader can accept one quote, reject it, or request another one.

That’s RFQ.

• Not mysterious.
• Not magica.
• Just price discovery before execution.

Why Not Just Use the Order Book?

Good question.

Most peope are used to order book trading. You open an exchange, see bids and asks, pace a market or imit order, and the system matches you.

That works we for many norma trades.But imagine you want to execute a arge trade.

If you pace a big market order directy into the order book, you might eat through mutipe price eves. The fina average price coud be much worse than what you expected.

That gap is caed sippage.

RFQ exists because sometimes traders do not want to shout their order into the market and hope for the best.

They want a cear quote first.

A Simpe Exampe

et’s say Aice wants to buy 500 ETH.

If she uses a norma market order, the trade may consume avaiabe se orders across different price eves. The first 50 ETH might be at one price, the next 100 at a higher price, and so on.

By the end, Aice may get a worse average price.

With RFQ, Aice can request a quote:“I want to buy 500 ETH. What price can you offer?”

• iquidity Provider A gives one price.
• iquidity Provider B gives another.
• iquidity Provider C gives a third.

Aice compares the quotes and chooses the best one.

In this case, RFQ heps Aice know the price before committing.

That certainty matters.

RFQ Is About Contro

The core vaue of RFQ is not just “getting a price.”

It is about contro.

With RFQ, traders can often get:

• Cear pricing before execution
• ower sippage on arge trades
• Better execution for ess iquid assets
• More privacy before the trade is competed
• A smoother experience for institutionasize orders

For sma trades, the difference may not fee huge.But for arger trades, RFQ can be the difference between a cean execution and a painfu surprise.

Who Provides the Quotes?

Usuay, quotes come from market makers or iquidity providers.

These participants are wiing to buy or se assets and provide prices to traders. They make markets by offering iquidity.

In an RFQ system, iquidity providers compete to offer attractive quotes.

The trader benefits because they can compare pricing instead of reying on ony one visibe order book.

Think of it ike asking severa shops:“I want to buy this item in buk. What’s your best price?”

• You are not obigated to accept the first answer.
• You ask, compare, and decide.

That is the spirit of RFQ.

RFQ in Crypto

In crypto, RFQ is especiay usefu because the market can be fragmented.

iquidity may be spread across different exchanges, chains, protocos, and market makers. Some assets have deep iquidity, whie others can move sharpy with reativey sma orders.

RFQ heps by creating a more direct path between traders and iquidity providers.

 

It is often used in:

• OTC trading
• arge spot trades
• Derivatives trading
• Structured products
• Crosschain or mutiasset transactions
• Institutiona trading
• DeFi aggregator systems

In DeFi, RFQ can aso appear inside trading aggregators, where professiona market makers provide quotes that users can accept onchain.

So yes, RFQ is not just od finance wearing a new jacket. It has become part of modern crypto market infrastructure too.

RFQ vs AMM: What’s the Difference?

If you have used decentraized exchanges, you may know AMMs, or Automated Market Makers. Of course, if you’ve studied the previous science popuarization essons, you aready have a thorough understanding of AMM.

AMMs use iquidity poos and formuas to determine prices. You trade against a poo, and the price changes based on the poo’s baance.

RFQ works differenty.

With RFQ, a quote is provided by a iquidity provider for a specific trade request.

• AMM pricing is formuadriven.
• RFQ pricing is quotedriven.

AMMs are great for open, awaysavaiabe iquidity. RFQ can be better when a trader needs customized pricing, arger size, or reduced sippage.

Neither mode is automaticay “better.” They sove different probems.

RFQ vs Order Book

Order books show pubic bids and asks. Traders pace orders, and matching happens based on price and time priority.

RFQ is more requestbased.

You ask for a price for a specific trade. iquidity providers respond. You decide whether to accept.

Order books are ike waking into a marketpace and seeing a posted prices.

RFQ is ike asking seected seers:“What can you do for this exact order?”

Again, different toos for different situations.

Does RFQ Guarantee the Best Price?

Not automaticay.

RFQ can improve execution quaity, but it depends on the system design, the number of iquidity providers, quote competitiveness, response speed, and market conditions.

A strong RFQ system shoud encourage competition among quote providers.

More competition usuay means better pricing for users.But users shoud sti understand that RFQ is a mechanism, not a magic button.

The quaity of execution depends on the quaity of iquidity behind it.

Why RFQ Matters for Users

Even if you are not pacing miiondoar trades, RFQ is sti worth understanding.

Why?

Because it teaches you how professiona trading infrastructure thinks about execution.

In crypto, peope often focus ony on price charts. Green cande, red cande, entry, exit. Very exciting, very emotiona.

But serious trading aso cares about execution:

• Can I get the price I expect?
• Wi my order move the market?
• How much sippage wi I suffer?
• Who is providing iquidity?
• Is the quote firm or just indicative?
• What happens if the market moves before execution?

RFQ forces traders to think in a more mature way.

• Not just “What is the price?”
• But “Can I actuay trade at that price?”

That difference is huge.

Fina Thoughts

RFQ, or Request for Quote, is a trading mechanism where a user asks iquidity providers for a specific price before executing a trade.

Its main vaue is:

• Better price certainty
• Reduced sippage for arger trades
• Access to competitive iquidity
• More controed execution
• Better handing of compex or ess iquid trades

In one sentence:RFQ ets traders ask, compare, and choose before they trade.And honesty, that is a pretty smart habit.

Because in fastmoving markets, the dispayed price is one thing. The price you actuay get is another.

RFQ exists to make that second part cearer.

 

 

[superextimmy]

#SuperEx #Guide #Earn

Before You Start

• Ensure you have downloaded and installed the latest version of the SuperEx App, and completed account registration and login.
• Ensure your Spot Account has sufficient available funds (e.g., BTC, DOGE, etc.) to subscribe to Earn products.

Step 1: Enter the Earn Page

1. Open the SuperEx App, find and tap the 【Earn】 icon in the bottom navigation bar on the Homepage.
2. After entering the main Earn page, you will see a list of various Earn products, including information such as different coins, terms, and expected yields.

Step 2: Select and Subscribe to an Earn Product

Taking the BTC Earn product as an example:

1. Filter Coins: At the top of the Earn page or in the category section, select “BTC” or another coin you wish to purchase.
2. Select a Specific Product: Browse the different Earn products under this coin (e.g., Flexible Earn, Fixed Earn, etc.), tap the card of the product you are interested in to enter the product details page.
3. View Product Details: Carefully read the key information of the product, including:

• Expected Annual Percentage Rate (APR)
• Investment term (for Fixed Earn products)
• Minimum subscription amount, account balance, remaining quota

4. Enter Subscription Amount:

• Enter the amount or quantity you wish to invest in the subscription area.
• Please ensure the entered amount does not exceed your available balance and the product limit.
• Auto-Subscribe: Option to enable auto-subscribe (Upon maturity, the system will automatically resubscribe your funds to a Flexible Earn product).

5. Confirm Subscription Information: Verify that the coin, amount, expected earnings, and other information are correct, then tap the 【Subscribe】 button.

Step 3: View Earn Holdings, Order History, and Withdraw Interest

1. Return to the App Homepage and tap 【Assets】 in the bottom navigation bar.
2. At the top of the Assets page, swipe the tabs horizontally, find and tap 【Earn】.
3. Upon entering the Earn Assets page, you can perform the following operations:

• View Holdings Details: A list of currently held Earn products, including product name, held amount, accumulated interest, pending interest, etc. Tap any product to view more detailed holding information.
• Withdraw Interest: On the holdings details page, tap the product you want to withdraw interest from to enter the product details page. Tap the 【Withdraw Interest】 button, enter the withdrawal amount, then tap 【Confirm Transfer】 to transfer the earnings to your Spot Account. Please note that interest for some products may be automatically distributed or require certain conditions to be met before withdrawal; please refer to the specific product rules.
• View Order History: Tap the icon in the top right corner of the Earn Assets page to view the history of all interest, subscriptions, and redemptions, including time, amount, status, etc.

— To be continued — 

 

[superextimmy]

#SuperEx #EducationaSeries

Guys, today we’re going to tak about something that sounds ike it beongs inside a trading engine instead of a norma human conversation: Liquidity Routing Mechanism.

I know.

The name fees ike someone took three serious words, stacked them together, and hoped nobody woud ask questions.

But actuay, Liquidity routing is one of the most important ideas behind modern crypto trading.

Because it answers a very rea question:When you cick “buy” or “swap,” where does the patform actuay find the Liquidity to compete your trade?

That question matters more than most peope think.

• Cick to register SuperEx
• Cick to downoad the SuperEx APP
• Cick to enter SuperEx CMC
• Cick to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

 

First, What Is Liquidity?

Before we tak about routing, we need to tak about Liquidity.

In trading, Liquidity basicay means:How easiy an asset can be bought or sod without causing a big price change.

• If a market has deep Liquidity, you can trade a arge amount with reativey ow sippage.
• If Liquidity is thin, even a medium-sized trade can move the price sharpy.

Simpe exampe:

If you want to buy $100 worth of BTC, amost any major exchange can hande it easiy.But if you want to buy $500,000 worth of a sma token with weak Liquidity, things can get messy. The price may jump as your order consumes avaiabe suppy.

That difference is Liquidity.

Liquidity is not just “there is a price on the screen.”Liquidity is whether you can actuay trade at that price, in the size you want.

So What Is Liquidity Routing?

Liquidity routing is the mechanism that decides where your trade shoud be sent to get the best possibe execution.

In crypto, Liquidity can be scattered across many paces:

• Centraized exchanges
• Decentraized exchanges
• AMM poos
• Order books
• Market makers
• RFQ systems
• ayer 2 networks
• Cross-chain Liquidity sources

The probem is that no singe source aways has the best price, the deepest Liquidity, or the owest cost.

So a Liquidity routing mechanism tries to answer:

• Where shoud this order go?
• Shoud it use one Liquidity source or severa?
• Shoud the order be spit?
• Which path gives the best price after fees, sippage, and execution risk?

That is Liquidity routing.

• It is ike a navigation system for trades.
• You te it where you want to go.
• It checks the avaiabe routes.
• Then it chooses the path that shoud get you there most efficienty.

A Simpe Exampe

• et’s say Aice wants to swap 10,000 USDT into ETH.
• The patform checks mutipe Liquidity sources.
• DEX A has a good price, but not enough depth.
• DEX B has deeper Liquidity, but sighty higher fees.
• A market maker can offer a strong RFQ quote.
• Another poo has a better rate for part of the trade.
• A basic system might send the entire order to one pace.

A smarter Liquidity router might spit the trade:

• Part goes to DEX A.
• Part goes to DEX B.
• Part uses an RFQ quote.

The fina resut may give Aice a better average execution price.

From Aice’s point of view, she just cicked swap. And Behind the scenes, the router did the work.

Why Liquidity Routing Matters

Most users care about one thing: What price do I actuay get?

• Not the price shown five seconds ago.
• Not the price on a singe exchange.
• Not the price that ooks good before fees.

The actua execution price.

Liquidity routing matters because it can improve that resut.

A good routing mechanism can hep with:

• Reducing sippage
• Finding better prices
• Accessing deeper Liquidity
• Spitting orders inteigenty
• Avoiding weak Liquidity poos
• Comparing fees and execution paths
• Improving trade success rates

In short, routing heps trading systems move from “pace the order somewhere” to “pace the order where it makes the most sense.”

 

That is a big difference.

Liquidity Is Fragmented in Crypto

In traditiona finance, Liquidity can aso be fragmented, but crypto takes fragmentation to another eve.

The same asset might trade on mutipe centraized exchanges, severa DEXs, different chains, ayer 2 networks, and synthetic or wrapped versions.

For exampe, a token may have Liquidity on Ethereum, Arbitrum, BNB Chain, and Base. It may aso have different poos with different fee tiers and different depths.

So when a user wants to trade, the system has to think.

Is the best route direct?

• Shoud it go through an intermediate asset ike USDT, USDC, ETH, or BTC?
• Shoud it spit the order across poos?
• Shoud it use a market maker quote?
• Shoud it avoid a path because gas costs are too high?

This is why Liquidity routing is not just a sma feature. It is infrastructure.

Direct Routes vs Muti-hop Routes

A direct route is simpe.You swap Token A directy into Token B.But sometimes the direct poo is weak. In that case, a muti-hop route may work better.

For exampe:

Token A → USDT → Token B

Or:

Token A → ETH → Token B

Why woud this hep?

Because USDT and ETH usuay have deeper Liquidity. Even though the trade has extra steps, the fina price may be better because each step has stronger Liquidity.

Of course, more steps can aso mean more fees, more gas, and more execution risk.So the router has to cacuate the trade-off.

• The best route is not aways the shortest route.
• The best route is the one with the best fina outcome.

Order Spitting: One Trade, Mutipe Sources

Another important part of Liquidity routing is order spitting.

Instead of sending the entire order to one poo or exchange, the router may divide it across mutipe sources.

Why?

Because Liquidity is often uneven.

One poo may offer the best price for the first part of the trade, but become worse as the trade size increases. Another source may be better for the next part.

So the router may spit the order to reduce price impact.

This is especiay usefu for arger trades.

Think of it ike buying a arge amount of something from severa suppiers instead of cearing out one shop and pushing the price up.

The goa is simpe: Get a better average execution price.

Routing Is Not Ony About Price.

Here is where things get interesting.

• A naive router might ony ook for the best dispayed price.
• A better router ooks at the fu cost of execution.

That incudes:

• Trading fees
• Gas fees
• Sippage
• Price impact
• Bridge costs
• Execution time
• Faiure risk
• MEV exposure
• Liquidity reiabiity

For exampe, a route may show a sighty better price but require high gas fees or invove a risky bridge. Another route may show a sighty worse price but be faster and more reiabe.

Which one is better?

It depends on the user, trade size, and market conditions.That is why routing is part math, part infrastructure, and part risk management.

Liquidity Routing in DeFi

In DeFi, Liquidity routing is often seen in aggregators.

When users swap tokens through an aggregator, the patform searches across mutipe DEXs and poos to find a better route.

• Sometimes it uses one poo.
• Sometimes it spits the trade.
• Sometimes it routes through intermediate tokens.
• Sometimes it combines mutipe paths.

This is why two swap patforms can show different output amounts for the same token pair.They may be using different routing agorithms, different Liquidity sources, or different fee assumptions.

The trade is not just about the token pair. It is about the path.

Liquidity Routing in Centraized or Hybrid Patforms

Liquidity routing is not ony a DeFi concept.

Centraized and hybrid trading patforms may aso route orders across interna order books, externa Liquidity providers, market makers, OTC desks, or connected exchanges.

The goa is the same: Find the best avaiabe execution under the patform’s rues and risk contros.

In hybrid systems, routing may be combined with off-chain matching, RFQ, and on-chain settement.That means the user experience can fee simpe, whie the backend is doing a ot of work.

Fina Thoughts

Liquidity routing is the mechanism that decides where and how a trade shoud be executed across avaiabe Liquidity sources.

Its goa is to improve the fina outcome for the user by considering price, depth, fees, sippage, and execution risk.

In one sentence: Liquidity routing is the navigation system behind your trade.

It finds the path, compares the options, and heps the patform execute more efficienty.

• The price you see is ony the beginning.
• The route your trade takes determines what you actuay get.

 

 

[superextimmy]

#SuperEx #Guide #FAQ

A 1 USD event is a brand-new interactive shopping experience method, which is the vane of fashion and trend, and can meet the shopping needs of individual and young consumers. It has the advantages of ultra-low threshold, ultra-high rewards, and simple participation.

The 1 USD Event is a chance to buy the products you want for only 1 USD. Each item is divided into “equal parts” and sold for 1 USD. When all “equal parts” of an item are sold, one lucky winner is randomly selected according to the 1 USD rule, and that lucky winner gets the item for 1 USD.

1 USD event features:

1. 0 participation threshold: all registered users are eligible to participate.
2. Ultra-low investment threshold: as low as 1 USD to be eligible to win expensive goods.
3. Variety of choices: users can choose the number of copies they want to order.

The 1 USD event aims to create a new shopping module that is 100% fair and just, 100% authentic, and integrates entertainment and shopping with the purpose of “1 USD shopping with unlimited surprises”.

Cick to enter SuperEx ISUD

 

1 USD Frequently Asked Questions

Question 1: After I place an order on 1 USD, will my account balance be deducted or frozen?

 

A: After placing a successful order on 1 USD, we will deduct the corresponding USDT from your account according to the amount of your order.

Question 2: Is it possible to pay the order with cryptocurrency other than USDT?

A: No, the event currently only supports USDT and ET.

Question 3: If the purchase is not successful, will the money for the order be refunded?

A: No, the amount paid for 1 USD is used to purchase a percentage share of the product, and a successful order is considered a successful purchase, which is a normal buying and selling transaction and cannot be returned.

Q4: If I do not receive a physical reward and choose to cash out, can I convert it to USDT or other cryptocurrencies?

A: Sorry, 1 USD is a welfare shopping platform, all prizes are in kind and cannot be converted it to USDT or other cryptocurrencies?

Q5: Is there a time limit for claiming the prize?

A: There is no limit, unclaimed rewards will always be stored in your account and can be claimed at any time.

Q6: Is it possible to collect multiple rewards together?

A: No, only one prize can be collected at a time, please repeat the collection process for multiple prizes.

Q7: Is it possible to transfer the rewards?

A: No, you can only receive rewards from your own account.

 

 

[superextimmy]

#SuperEx #EducationalSeries

Guys, let’s imagine a very uncomfortable trading moment.

The market is moving fast. Prices are jumping. Everyone is trying to exit, enter, hedge, or panic-click something at the same time. You place an order, expecting the platform to find someone on the other side.

But suddenly, liquidity looks thin.

• The order book feels empty.
• The pool cannot absorb the trade cleanly.
• Market makers widen spreads.
• The price starts slipping harder than expected.

That is the moment when users discover a truth that sounds simple but hurts when ignored: A market is only useful if there is enough liquidity when you actually need it.

In other words, liquidity serves as a safety net during your lowest moments — that’s what makes it truly valuable.

This is where the Backstop Liquidity Mechanism comes in.

It is not the shiny front-page feature people talk about first. But in stressful market conditions, it can become one of the mechanisms that helps keep trading from falling apart.

• Cick to register SuperEx
• Cick to downoad the SuperEx APP
• Cick to enter SuperEx CMC
• Cick to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

What Is Backstop Liquidity?

Backstop liquidity refers to backup liquidity that can support a market when normal liquidity becomes insufficient.

In simple terms: It is the liquidity safety net behind the market.

When regular liquidity sources are deep enough, users may not notice it.

But when the market becomes stressed, backstop liquidity can help absorb orders, reduce extreme slippage, support liquidations, or prevent execution from becoming chaotic.

• It does not mean liquidity is unlimited.
• It means the system has an additional layer of support when ordinary liquidity is not enough.

Why Markets Need a Backstop

Liquidity can disappear faster than most people expect.

During normal conditions, an order book may look healthy. A pool may look deep. Market makers may quote actively.

But in extreme volatility, everything changes.

• Market makers may reduce exposure.
• Liquidity providers may withdraw capital.
• Order books may thin out.
• AMM pools may become imbalanced.
• Large liquidations may hit the market at once.

Without backup liquidity, users may face:

• Severe slippage
• Failed trades
• Disorderly liquidations
• Price dislocation
• Wider spreads
• Reduced market confidence

A backstop mechanism exists because markets do not only need liquidity on good days.

They need liquidity when everyone is stressed.

A Simple Example

Imagine a perpetual futures market.

Most of the time, trades are matched through the order book and supported by market makers.

Then a sudden price crash happens.

Many leveraged positions need to be liquidated quickly. Regular buyers are not enough. Market makers widen spreads because risk is rising. If the system simply throws all liquidation orders into thin liquidity, prices may crash even harder.

A backstop liquidity mechanism can step in as an additional liquidity layer.

• It may help absorb part of the flow, support orderly liquidation, or reduce extreme price impact.
• The goal is not to stop market movement.
• The goal is to prevent execution from becoming disorderly.

Where Backstop Liquidity Can Come From

Different platforms may design backstop liquidity in different ways.

Common sources may include:

• Dedicated liquidity reserves
• Insurance funds
• Protocol-owned liquidity
• Market maker commitments
• Liquidation backstop pools
• Emergency liquidity providers
• Auction mechanisms
• Risk reserves
• Treasury-supported liquidity

The exact design depends on the platform and product type.

• For spot trading, backstop liquidity may help improve execution depth.
• For derivatives, it may support liquidations and reduce systemic risk.
• For lending protocols, it may help handle bad debt or collateral auctions.

Backstop Liquidity and Liquidations

Backstop liquidity is especially important in leveraged markets.

When traders use leverage, liquidation becomes part of the risk system.

If a position falls below maintenance margin, the system may need to close it to protect the platform and other users.

But liquidation requires liquidity.

If there is not enough liquidity to close positions smoothly, losses can grow, prices can move violently, and bad debt may appear.

A backstop mechanism can help by providing additional buyers, liquidity pools, or auction participants when normal market depth is not enough.

In this sense, backstop liquidity is not just about better trading.

It is also about risk containment.

Backstop Liquidity Is Not Price Protection

This part is important.

Backstop liquidity does not mean the platform will protect users from all losses.

• It does not guarantee a fixed price.
• It does not stop markets from moving.
• It does not remove liquidation risk.
• It does not make leveraged trading safe.

What it can do is help markets function more smoothly under stress.

Think of it as an emergency support layer, not a promise that prices will stay comfortable.

Markets can still move against users. Backstop liquidity simply helps reduce disorder when liquidity becomes strained.

Why Backstop Liquidity Matters for Users

Even if you never think about backstop liquidity directly, it affects the quality of the market you trade in.

It can influence:

• Trade execution during stress
• Slippage during volatility
• Liquidation efficiency
• Platform risk resilience
• Market confidence
• System stability
• User protection under extreme conditions

Users usually notice infrastructure only when it breaks.

Backstop liquidity is one of those mechanisms designed to reduce the chance of breaking when conditions get ugly.

What Makes a Good Backstop Mechanism?

A strong backstop liquidity mechanism should be more than a vague promise.

Users should look for signs of clear design, such as:

• Defined liquidity sources
• Transparent trigger conditions
• Clear liquidation rules
• Risk limits
• Auditability
• Real-time monitoring
• Fair execution logic
• Separation between normal liquidity and emergency support
• Sustainable funding

The strongest designs are not only reactive.

They are prepared before the stress event happens.

How SuperEx Academy Looks at Backstop Liquidity

At SuperEx Academy, we see backstop liquidity as part of the deeper infrastructure behind reliable crypto markets.

Many beginners focus only on visible trading features:

• Fees.
• Charts.
• Leverage.
• Token pairs.
• Rewards.

But more mature users also look at market structure:

• Where does liquidity come from?
• What happens when normal liquidity disappears?
• How are liquidations handled?
• Is there an emergency support layer?
• Can the system absorb stress without creating chaos?

Backstop liquidity belongs to this second layer of thinking.

It helps users understand that a good trading platform is not only built for normal days.

It must also be designed for abnormal days.

Final Thoughts

Backstop Liquidity Mechanism is a backup liquidity support system designed to help markets function when normal liquidity becomes insufficient.

Its value includes:

• Supporting stressed markets
• Reducing extreme slippage
• Improving liquidation efficiency
• Strengthening platform risk resilience
• Helping prevent disorderly execution
• Supporting market confidence under volatility

In one sentence: Backstop liquidity is the market’s emergency liquidity layer.

• It does not remove risk.
• It does not guarantee prices.

But when liquidity gets thin and pressure rises, it can help the system stay more orderly. And in crypto, that kind of backup layer matters more than most people realize.

 

[superextimmy]

#SuperEx #EducationalSeries #DEX

Guys, today we’re going to talk about something that sounds like it belongs in a warehouse, but actually sits right in the middle of trading: inventory risk.

Yes, the word “inventory” makes people think of boxes, shelves, supply chains, maybe some tired manager counting products at 2 a.m.

But in financial markets, inventory does not mean sneakers in a storage room. It means assets held by market makers, liquidity providers, trading desks, or platforms while they are providing liquidity to the market.

And here is the uncomfortable part: If you provide liquidity, you are not just helping others trade. You are also holding risk：

• You may quote prices.
• You may buy from one user and sell to another.
• You may hold tokens, stablecoins, or derivatives positions for a while.

During that time, the market can move against you. That is why Inventory Risk Management matters.

It is the system behind the scenes that helps liquidity providers avoid becoming unwilling longterm holders of assets they only meant to quote for a few seconds.

• Cick to register SuperEx
• Cick to downoad the SuperEx APP
• Cick to enter SuperEx CMC
• Cick to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

 

What Is Inventory in Trading?

In trading, inventory refers to the assets or positions held by a liquidity provider while making markets or executing trades.

For example, a market maker may hold:

• BTC
• ETH
• Stablecoins
• Altcoins
• Perpetual futures positions
• Options exposure
• Crossvenue positions

The market maker holds these assets because they need to quote both buy and sell prices.

• If users keep selling one asset to the market maker, the market maker’s inventory of that asset increases.
• If users keep buying that asset from the market maker, the inventory decreases.

Inventory changes constantly as trades flow through the system.

What Is Inventory Risk?

Inventory risk is the risk that the value of held assets changes in an unfavorable direction before they can be hedged, sold, or balanced.

In simple terms: You hold an asset temporarily, but the market moves against you.

Imagine a market maker buys a large amount of Token X from users because many people are selling. If Token X keeps falling before the market maker can sell or hedge it, the market maker takes a loss.

That is inventory risk.

It is especially important in crypto because prices can move fast, liquidity can vanish, and volatility can spike without warning.

A Simple Example

Let’s say a market maker is quoting ETH/USDT.

The market maker offers to buy ETH at 3,000 USDT and sell ETH at 3,005 USDT.

Suddenly, many users start selling ETH.

The market maker keeps buying ETH from users. Its ETH inventory increases.

If ETH price stays stable, no big problem.

But if ETH quickly drops to 2,900 USDT, the market maker is now holding ETH that is worth much less than the purchase price.

That loss comes from inventory risk.

Why Inventory Risk Matters

Inventory risk matters because liquidity is not free.When market makers provide liquidity, they are taking the other side of user trades.

If they cannot manage inventory risk, they may:

• Widen spreads
• Reduce quote size
• Pull liquidity
• Increase fees
• Avoid certain assets
• Become less competitive
• Suffer large losses during volatility

And when liquidity providers step back, users feel it immediately.

• Spreads become wider.
• Slippage becomes worse.
• Execution quality drops.

So inventory risk management is not only a concern for market makers.

It directly affects users.

How Inventory Risk Is Managed

Inventory risk management uses multiple tools to keep exposure under control.

Common methods include:

• Hedging positions
• Adjusting quotes
• Changing spreads
• Setting inventory limits
• Rebalancing across venues
• Using derivatives
• Managing order size
• Dynamic fee adjustment
• Riskbased liquidity routing

For example, if a market maker holds too much ETH, it may lower its buy quote and improve its sell quote to encourage users to buy ETH from it.Or it may hedge ETH exposure using futures.

• The goal is not to avoid holding inventory completely.
• The goal is to prevent inventory from becoming too risky.

Quote Adjustment

One of the most common tools is quote adjustment.

If a market maker has too much of an asset, it may adjust prices to reduce that inventory.

For example: If it holds too much ETH, it may quote a more attractive sell price and a less attractive buy price. This encourages users to buy ETH from the market maker rather than sell more ETH to it.

In this way, quotes are not only about market price. They are also inventory management signals.

Hedging

Hedging is another major tool.

 

If a liquidity provider holds too much spot exposure, it can use derivatives to reduce risk.

For example, if a market maker holds a large amount of ETH spot, it may short ETH perpetual futures to offset price risk.

If ETH falls, the spot inventory loses value, but the short futures position gains value.This does not remove all risk, but it can reduce exposure to directional price movement.

Inventory Limits

A strong risk system usually sets inventory limits. This means the market maker or platform defines how much exposure it is willing to hold in a specific asset.

If inventory approaches the limit, the system may:

• Reduce quote size
• Widen spreads
• Stop quoting temporarily
• Route orders elsewhere
• Hedge more aggressively
• Trigger rebalancing

Inventory limits help prevent a liquidity provider from accidentally accumulating too much risk.

Rebalancing Across Venues

Crypto liquidity is spread across many venues.

A market maker may hold too much of an asset on one exchange and too little on another.

Rebalancing means moving or trading assets across venues to restore a healthier inventory structure.

This can involve centralized exchanges, DEXs, OTC desks, bridges, or internal treasury systems.

Rebalancing is important, but it also has costs:

• Transfer fees
• Gas fees
• Bridge risk
• Execution delay
• Price movement during transfer

So inventory management must consider not only what to rebalance, but when and how.

Inventory Risk in DeFi

In DeFi, inventory risk often appears through liquidity pools.

Liquidity providers deposit assets into pools and earn fees, but they also face risks such as impermanent loss and pool imbalance.

When prices move sharply, the asset composition in the pool changes.

LPs may end up holding more of the underperforming asset and less of the stronger asset.

That is a form of inventory risk.

AMM designs, dynamic fees, concentrated liquidity strategies, and hedging tools can all help manage this risk.

Why Users Should Care

Many people might think, “I’m not a market maker after all — this has nothing to do with me!”

You may not be a market maker. You may not run a liquidity desk.

But inventory risk still affects you.

When liquidity providers manage inventory well, users often get:

• Tighter spreads
• Better depth
• Lower slippage
• More stable liquidity
• Better execution quality

When inventory risk is poorly managed, users may see:

• Wider spreads
• Shallow books
• Unavailable quotes
• Worse prices
• Higher fees
• Liquidity disappearing during volatility

So yes, inventory risk sounds like a backend problem.

But the result shows up directly in the trading interface.

How SuperEx Academy Looks at Inventory Risk Management

At SuperEx Academy, we see inventory risk management as one of the hidden foundations of trading quality.

Many users look at the visible parts of trading:

• Price.
• Fee.
• Chart.
• Leverage.
• Order type.

But behind those visible elements, liquidity providers are constantly managing exposure.

They need to decide:

• How much inventory can we hold?
• Should we hedge now?
• Should we widen spreads?
• Should we route this order elsewhere?
• Should we rebalance across venues?
• Is this asset too risky to quote deeply?

These decisions shape the market users experience.

Understanding inventory risk helps users see that liquidity is not just a number on the screen. It is a living risk system.

Final Thoughts

Inventory Risk Management is the process of controlling the risk that comes from holding assets or positions while providing liquidity.

Its value includes:

• Protecting liquidity providers from excessive exposure
• Supporting tighter spreads
• Maintaining deeper liquidity
• Improving execution quality
• Reducing liquidity withdrawal during volatility
• Strengthening market stability

In one sentence: Inventory risk management helps liquidity providers stay in the market without being crushed by the assets they temporarily hold. And when liquidity providers can stay active, users get better markets.

That is why this backend concept matters much more than it sounds.

 

 

[superextimmy]

SuperEx Guide: Abnormal Trading Behavior Definitions

 

#SuperEx #Guide

1. In order to properly deal with trading anomalies, prevent and resolve market risks on SuperEx exchanges in a timely manner, safeguard the order of trading and maintain market stability, SuperEx will manage users trading behavior and, if abnormal trading behavior is found, may initiate abnormal trading behavior processing procedures and take corresponding management measures for users of abnormal trading.

• Cick to register SuperEx
• Cick to downoad the SuperEx APP
• Cick to enter SuperEx CMC
• Cick to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

 

2. The abnormal trading conditions mentioned in this article refer to the conditions that cause or may cause some or all of SuperEx transactions to fail to proceed normally.

3. When a user participates in a transaction under one of the following circumstances, it will be considered as an abnormal trading behavior:

3.1 Multiple self-buying and self-selling transactions with oneself as the trading object or multiple transactions between users within a group of effectively controlled linked accounts with each other as counterparties (self-trading), including but not limited to single or multiple trading accounts with the same source of funds, the same IP, synchronized trading behavior, and other abnormal behavior.

Single or multiple effectively controlled linked accounts using trading means such as matching and trading methods to manipulate market prices; multiple transactions between customers within a single or multiple effectively controlled linked accounts with each other as counterparties.

3.2 Behaviors that issue trading orders by means of programmed trading, which may affect the security of the SuperEx exchange system or the normal trading order;

 

4. Other circumstances determined by SuperEx Exchange.

5. Abnormal trading behavior processing

In order to ensure the security of the SuperEx trading market, if the user has one of the abnormal trading behaviors listed in this announcement, SuperEx can take the following measures for the abnormal trading account without any notice:

5.1 Require users to report transactions;

5.2 Restricting the opening and closing positions. If the user with abnormal trading behaviour still has open positions, they will be automatically closed by the system;

5.3 Restricting the withdrawal and deposit of funds from the account;

5.4 Closing the account and forfeiting the remaining assets;

5.5 Other measures that can be taken according to the operational rules of the exchange.

Responsibility statement

Users participating in SuperEx trading should abide by the laws and regulations and the operational rules of the exchange, and must accept the reasonable management and monitoring of their trading behavior by the exchange, and consciously regulate their trading behavior.

SuperEx has the right to seek fair and legal remedies for abnormal trading behaviors, including but not limited to restricting all trading activities of abnormal trading accounts. SuperEx will not be held responsible for any economic losses caused by suspected violations of these rules.

6. These rules are subject to final interpretation by SuperEx Exchange.

 

 

[superextimmy]

SuperEx Educational Series: Understanding Market Making Algorithm

 

already felt the impact of market making.

Behind the simple trading interface, there may be algorithms constantly deciding:

• Where should we quote?
• How much should we quote?
• Should spreads be wider or tighter?
• Are we holding too much inventory?
• Is the market becoming risky?
• Should we hedge, pause, or rebalance?

A market making algorithm is not just “a bot placing orders.”It is a risk engine, pricing engine, and liquidity engine working together.

• Cick to register SuperEx
• Cick to downoad the SuperEx APP
• Cick to enter SuperEx CMC
• Cick to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

What Is Market Making?

The term “Market Making” gives me the impression of being a professional financial practitioner — I believe the same is true for most people. Some may instinctively resist it, but the concept is actually quite straightforward to understand：Market making means continuously providing buy and sell quotes to a market.

A market maker usually offers both sides:

• A bid price, where it is willing to buy.
• An ask price, where it is willing to sell.

The difference between the two is called the spread.

For example:

• Buy ETH at 3,000 USDT.
• Sell ETH at 3,005 USDT.

By quoting both sides, the market maker helps other users trade more easily.

Without market makers or liquidity providers, users may face wider spreads, slower execution, and higher slippage.

What Is a Market Making Algorithm?

A market making algorithm is a system that automatically generates, updates, and manages buy and sell quotes based on market conditions.

It may consider:

• Current market price
• Order book depth
• Volatility
• Trading volume
• Inventory levels
• Risk limits
• Fees
• Liquidity demand
• Cross-exchange prices
• Hedging cost

In simple terms: A market making algorithm decides how to provide liquidity without taking uncontrolled risk.

It is trying to do two things at the same time:

• Help the market trade smoothly.
• Protect the liquidity provider from being exposed too heavily.

A Simple Example

Imagine a market maker is providing liquidity for BTC/USDT. The current fair price of BTC is around 70,000 USDT.

The algorithm may quote:

• Buy BTC at 69,990 USDT.
• Sell BTC at 70,010 USDT.

If the market is calm and liquidity is deep, the spread may stay tight.

But if volatility suddenly increases, the algorithm may widen the quotes:

• Buy at 69,950 USDT.
• Sell at 70,050 USDT.

Why?

Because price risk is higher. The market maker does not want to buy BTC right before the price drops or sell BTC right before the price jumps.

So the algorithm adjusts.

The Core Goals of Market Making Algorithms

A market making algorithm usually has several goals.

• First, it provides liquidity so users can trade.
• Second, it earns spread or fees as compensation for taking risk.
• Third, it manages inventory so the market maker does not hold too much of one asset.
• Fourth, it reacts to market volatility.
• Fifth, it reduces the chance of being exploited by faster traders, stale prices, or sudden market moves.

So the algorithm is constantly balancing: Competitiveness vs safety.

• If quotes are too wide, users may not trade.
• If quotes are too tight, the market maker may lose money during volatility.

Inventory Management

Inventory is one of the biggest concerns in market making.

If many users sell ETH to the market maker, the market maker’s ETH inventory increases.If ETH price then falls, the market maker suffers losses.

A market making algorithm may respond by adjusting quotes.

If it holds too much ETH, it may:

• Offer a better sell price to reduce ETH inventory
• Offer a worse buy price to avoid buying more ETH
• Hedge exposure using futures
• Route risk to another venue
• Trigger rebalancing

This is why market making is not just about placing orders.It is about controlling the assets accumulated through those orders.

Volatility Response

Markets are not always calm.

When volatility rises, market making becomes more dangerous.Prices can move before the algorithm updates quotes. Traders may hit stale quotes. Inventory can become risky very quickly.

A good market making algorithm reacts by:

• Widening spreads
• Reducing order size
• Updating quotes faster
• Increasing hedging activity
• Lowering exposure limits

Temporarily pausing quotes in extreme conditions.This is not the algorithm “being unfriendly.”It is risk management.

If market makers do not protect themselves during extreme conditions, they may withdraw completely. And if liquidity disappears, users face worse execution.

Market Making in Order Books

In order book markets, market making algorithms place limit orders on both sides of the book.

They decide:

• At what price should we place bids?
• At what price should we place asks?
• How much size should each order have?
• How many layers should we quote?
• When should we cancel and replace orders?

The goal is to keep the book liquid while managing risk.

A deeper order book usually helps users execute trades with less price impact.

Market Making in AMMs

In AMM-based DeFi, market making looks different.

Instead of placing orders manually, liquidity providers deposit assets into pools, and prices are determined by formulas.

But algorithms still matter，They may help decide:

• Which pool to provide liquidity to
• What price range to use in concentrated liquidity
• When to rebalance liquidity
• How to hedge impermanent loss
• How fees should adjust dynamically
• When to withdraw or redeploy capital

So even in AMMs, market making is not passive，It can be highly algorithmic.

Why Market Making Algorithms Matter for Users

You might be wondering, what does this have to do with me as an ordinary trader? Why should I learn this?

Most users do not interact with market making algorithms directly,But they feel the result every time they trade.

Good market making can bring:

• Tighter spreads
• Deeper liquidity
• Lower slippage
• Faster execution
• More stable quotes
• Better market confidence

Poor market making can lead to:

• Wide spreads
• Thin order books
• Unstable prices
• Failed execution
• High slippage
• Liquidity disappearing during volatility

So yes, market making algorithms may sound like backend infrastructure.But their effects show up clearly on the front end.

Market Making Is Not Risk-Free

Some people think market makers simply earn spread all day.Nice idea, but reality is much tougher.Market makers face many risks:

• Inventory risk
• Adverse selection
• Volatility risk
• Latency risk
• Hedging risk
• Liquidity withdrawal risk
• Exchange or smart contract risk
• Cross-venue price differences

A market making algorithm exists because these risks must be managed continuously. The spread is not free money. It is compensation for providing liquidity under uncertainty.

How SuperEx Academy Looks at Market Making Algorithms

At SuperEx Academy, we see market making algorithms as one of the core engines behind modern crypto trading.

Many beginners only see the visible parts. But behind those numbers, liquidity is being actively managed.

A more mature user starts asking:

• Who is providing liquidity?
• Why is the spread narrow or wide?
• Why did liquidity disappear during volatility?
• How does the platform manage inventory risk?
• Are quotes coming from order books, AMMs, RFQ, or market makers?
• How does the system protect execution quality?

This is the difference between looking at a market and understanding how a market works.

Final Thoughts

A Market Making Algorithm is a system that automatically provides and manages liquidity by generating buy and sell quotes while controlling risk.

Its value includes:

• Supporting market liquidity
• Reducing spreads
• Improving execution quality
• Managing inventory risk
• Responding to volatility
• Helping markets function more smoothly

In one sentence: A market making algorithm is the engine that helps keep a market tradable.

• It does not remove risk.
• It does not guarantee perfect prices.

But when designed well, it helps users trade in a market that feels deeper, smoother, and more reliable.And in crypto, that matters a lot.

Because a market without liquidity is just a price on a screen.

 

[superextimmy]

SuperEx Guide: Withdrawal not received and Deposit has not arrived

#SuperEx #Guide

Withdrawal not received

Dear customer, you can follow the steps below to solve the problem that the withdrawal has not arrived:

1. Please check whether your withdrawal application has been approved in the wallet order first. If not, please wait patiently, we will not deduct any withdrawal application for no reason. (It is normal for assets to be frozen during the withdrawal process, don’t worry about it)

2. If your withdrawal application on SuperEx has been approved, you can check the transaction status on the block through hash.

When the block status shows that it has been confirmed, please check the current number of block confirmations to see whether the number of confirmed blocks meets the requirements of the receiving platform, if it does, please wait patiently for more confirmed blocks, the arrival time will change due to network conditions.

When it is confirmed that the amount is sufficient but it has not yet been received, please contact the receiving platform to the transferred assets for you. The transferred assets cannot be processed by SuperEx.

• Cick to register SuperEx
• Cick to downoad the SuperEx APP
• Cick to enter SuperEx CMC
• Cick to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

 

Deposit has not arrived

I have deposited digital assets to SuperEx. Why does the deposit platform prompt that the transfer is successful, but SuperEx hasn’t received it after a long time?

 

Blockchain asset transfer is divided into three steps:The sender sends out the account — the blockchain confirms — the receiver enters the account;

Step 1: Successful transfer means that the platform or wallet from which the coin was withdrawn has performed the transfer operation;

Step 2: Complete the corresponding block confirmation. Blockchain congestion, delays, etc. will cause your digital assets to be delayed in completing all confirmations;

Step 3: Complete the account payment as soon as possible after the confirmation to the platform is completed;

You can ask the transferor for TXID self-checking or contact the customer service of SuperEx official website to inquire about the transfer progress.

If the blockchain shows that the confirmation is complete, but the SuperEx account has not arrived, please contact the customer service of SuperEx official website and provide the SuperEx email account, token name, and txid;

If the blockchain shows that it is confirming, please wait patiently for the confirmation of the blockchain to be completed before SuperEx can post the account for you;

If you have not found the TXID for a long time after applying for withdrawal to SuperEx on a certain platform, please contact the other party’s platform.

 

[superextimmy]

SuperEx Educational Series: Understanding Just-in-time Liquidity

 

#SuperEx #EducationalSeries

Guys, today we’re going to talk about a liquidity concept that sounds almost too convenient: Just-in-time Liquidity.

The name already gives off a very “arrive exactly when needed” feeling. Like liquidity is sitting somewhere backstage, drinking coffee, waiting for the perfect moment to walk in and say, “Relax, I’m here.”

But in trading, this idea is actually very important.

Because most users assume liquidity is always sitting there in the market, ready to be used. You open a swap page, see a quote, click confirm, and expect the trade to happen smoothly.

But liquidity is not always permanently parked in one pool or one order book.

Sometimes, liquidity can be supplied only when a specific trading opportunity appears. It enters right before execution, helps complete the trade, and then leaves afterward.

That is the basic idea behind Just-in-time Liquidity, or JIT Liquidity.

• Cick to register SuperEx
• Cick to downoad the SuperEx APP
• Cick to enter SuperEx CMC
• Cick to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

What Is Just-in-time Liquidity?

Just-in-time Liquidity refers to liquidity that is provided only at the moment it is needed for a specific trade or market event.Instead of liquidity staying permanently in a pool, order book, or market, a liquidity provider supplies capital right before execution.

In simple terms: JIT liquidity appears when a trade needs it, instead of sitting idle all the time.

This can happen in different environments, including DeFi pools, RFQ systems, market maker networks, and advanced trading infrastructure.

A Simple Example

Imagine Alice wants to swap a large amount of USDT into ETH.

The existing pool liquidity is not enough to execute the trade at a good price.A liquidity provider sees this opportunity and temporarily adds liquidity right before Alice’s trade executes.

• The trade goes through with better depth.
• The liquidity provider earns fees or spread.
• After the trade, the liquidity may be removed again.

From Alice’s perspective, the trade may look smoother.Behind the scenes, liquidity arrived exactly when the trade needed it.

Why JIT Liquidity Exists

Liquidity providers do not want capital sitting idle forever. Providing liquidity has costs and risks:

• Inventory risk
• Impermanent loss
• Opportunity cost
• Market volatility
• Smart contract risk
• Adverse selection
• Capital inefficiency

If liquidity can be deployed only when there is a clear trading opportunity, capital may be used more efficiently.

That is why JIT liquidity exists.

It allows liquidity providers to be more selective. Instead of keeping capital exposed all the time, they can provide liquidity only when the expected reward justifies the risk.

JIT Liquidity in DeFi

In DeFi, JIT liquidity is often discussed in the context of concentrated liquidity AMMs.In some AMM designs, liquidity providers can choose specific price ranges for their liquidity.

If a large swap is about to happen, a sophisticated liquidity provider may add liquidity into the exact price range where the trade will execute.

This can allow them to capture fees from that trade while limiting time spent exposed to the pool.

The liquidity may enter right before the swap and exit shortly after.

That is powerful, but also controversial.

Why JIT Liquidity Can Be Useful

JIT liquidity can bring several benefits.

• For traders, it may help improve execution by adding extra depth at the moment of trade.
• For liquidity providers, it can improve capital efficiency because funds are used only when opportunities appear.
• For markets, it may help reduce price impact for certain large trades.

Potential benefits include:

• Better capital efficiency
• More targeted liquidity provision
• Lower price impact in some trades
• More flexible market maker participation
• Improved execution depth during specific moments

In the best case, JIT liquidity helps match liquidity supply with real trading demand.

Why JIT Liquidity Is Controversial

Here is where things get interesting.

JIT liquidity can improve efficiency, but it may also create fairness concerns.

Long-term liquidity providers keep capital in the pool and take ongoing risk. JIT liquidity providers may enter only when a profitable trade appears, capture fees, and leave quickly.

• Some people see this as efficient competition.
• Others see it as opportunistic behavior that takes fee income away from passive liquidity providers.

There are also questions around:

• Whether JIT liquidity improves user execution enough
• Whether it harms long-term liquidity providers
• Whether it increases strategic behavior around pending trades
• Whether it creates advantages for faster or more sophisticated participants

So JIT liquidity is not simply “good” or “bad.” It depends on the design and the market context.

JIT Liquidity vs Traditional Liquidity

Traditional liquidity is usually available continuously. Liquidity providers keep capital in a pool or order book and remain exposed to market risk over time.

JIT liquidity is more event-driven.

It appears when a specific trade or opportunity is detected. The difference is simple:

• Traditional liquidity is always-on.
• JIT liquidity is opportunity-based.

Traditional liquidity supports market stability over time.

JIT liquidity can improve execution at specific moments.

Both can be useful, but they play different roles.

JIT Liquidity and MEV

In on-chain markets, JIT liquidity can sometimes be connected with MEV.

Because pending transactions may be visible before confirmation, sophisticated participants can detect large trades and react quickly.

They may add liquidity right before the transaction and remove it after.

This is different from classic front-running, but it still raises questions about who gets access to timing advantages.

Some protocols may design rules to reduce harmful behavior, while others may allow open competition.

The key issue is whether JIT liquidity improves the final user outcome or mainly benefits faster actors.

Why Regular Users Should Care

Most users will never manually provide JIT liquidity. But they may still experience its effects. JIT liquidity can influence:

• Swap execution quality
• Price impact
• Fee distribution
• Liquidity provider returns
• Pool behavior
• Market fairness
• MEV exposure

If designed well, it may help users get better execution.

If designed poorly, it may mainly benefit advanced participants while weakening incentives for long-term liquidity.

So even if the mechanism feels technical, its impact can show up in the final trade result.

How SuperEx Academy Looks at JIT Liquidity

At SuperEx Academy, we see Just-in-time Liquidity as part of the larger evolution of crypto market structure.

Crypto liquidity is becoming more dynamic.

It is no longer only about who deposits capital and leaves it there. It is also about who can provide the right liquidity, in the right place, at the right time.

That connects directly with:

• Liquidity routing.
• Market making algorithms.
• Inventory risk management.
• Slippage control.
• Price impact models.
• MEV protection.
• Dynamic fee adjustment.

Understanding JIT liquidity helps users ask better questions:

• Where did this liquidity come from?
• Was it available before the trade?
• Did it improve execution?
• Who earned the fees?
• Does this mechanism support long-term market health?

That is how users move from simply using a market to understanding how the market is being built.

Final Thoughts

Just-in-time Liquidity is liquidity provided at the exact moment it is needed for a specific trade or market opportunity.

In one sentence: JIT liquidity is liquidity that shows up exactly when the trade needs it.

It can make markets more efficient. But like many powerful mechanisms in crypto, the design matters.Because liquidity that arrives at the right time can help users.

Liquidity that only arrives for the wrong incentives can reshape the market in ways users may not notice at first.

 

[superextimmy]

SuperEx Guide: Description of common scam routines

 

#SuperEx #Guide #Exchange

Once a crypto withdrawal is completed, assets cannot be reversed.

That’s why users should stay alert to common scam methods in the crypto market, including:

⚠️ Fake investment groups
⚠️ Impersonation of official staff
⚠️ “High-return” arbitrage traps
⚠️ Fake friend borrowing scams
⚠️ Off-platform OTC fraud
⚠️ Counterfeit tokens and fake USDT
⚠️ Fake Telegram trading groups

Remember:

🔹 SuperEx officials will never privately ask users to transfer assets
🔹 Always verify identities through official channels
🔹 Avoid private off-platform transactions
🔹 Double-check wallet addresses and token authenticity

In crypto, security awareness is just as important as trading knowledge.

Stay cautious. Protect your assets.

• Cick to register SuperEx
• Cick to downoad the SuperEx APP
• Cick to enter SuperEx CMC
• Cick to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

The scam routines are as follows:

Investment scams

1. Get in touch: Add to the group through social platforms.

1. Gaining trust: Arbitrarily claiming to cooperate with various large-scale platforms, pretending to be official personnel, etc. to gain trust.
2. High-volume incentives: Induce in the form of “brick-moving arbitrage”, “high rebates”, “operations with orders”, and “increasing interest by depositing coins”, coupled with the incentives of group friends to keep gaining orders.
3. Common investment types: including new currency investment (actually a stand-alone currency, not online on other mainstream exchanges), ICO, gambling, MLM currency, fund disk, deposit currency and interest-generating investment types. Once withdrawn, the assets cannot be transferred back.

Security reminder: Any unauthorized claim to be a SuperEx partner or impersonation of the identity of SuperEx official personnel is suspected of fraud. Be alert to various forms of fraud such as investment and gambling.

“Pretend to be your friend” scam

1. Obtain trust: impersonate or steal friends’ social accounts.
2. Fraud method: borrow money from you for reasons such as loan, turnover, etc., and refuse to confirm the identity by video or voice in the process. Once you withdraw coins carelessly, you will be scammed successfully.
3. Gaining trust: impersonate or steal friends’ social accounts.
4. Fraud method: borrow money from you for reasons such as loan, turnover, etc., and refuse to confirm the identity by video or voice in the process. Once you withdraw coins carelessly, you will be successfullyscammed.

Security reminder: While withdrawing coins to a friend, please confirm that the other party is your friend.

Off-platform transaction fraud

Gaining trust: Gaining trust through the identity of online dating, online friending, investment teacher, etc.

Fraud method 1: Non-payment for over-the-counter transactions. For off-platform transactions, it is agreed that the ryptocurrency will be paid first, and the buyer will not pay after you withdraw the cryptocurrency.

Fraud method 2: Over-the-counter transactions do not send coins. For off-platform transactions, it is agreed that the cryptocurrency will be paid first, and the seller did not give the cryptocurrency after you paid.

Fraud method 3: Over-the-counter transactions are counterfeit cryptocurrency. For off-platform transactions, it is agreed that the cryptocurrency will be paid first, and after you have paid, the seller will deposit the fake USDT (USDT issued by a non-Tether company).

Fraud method 4: Sell order of counterfeit coins. In the early stage, based on the transaction limit and other reasons, the small deposit order sent to you to sell on behalf of the platform. Later, after scamming a large amount of funds, deposit fake USDT (USDT issued by non-Tether companies).

Security reminder: Do not trade privately outside the platform.

Counterfeit cryptocurrency fraud — Fake ET

1. Gain trust: form a Telegram group similar to the [SuperEx official brick arbitrage group] for fraud.
2. Fraud method: Under the guise of “brick arbitrage”, users are induced to transfer personal ETH to a certain wallet. Promise to transfer ET to users in proportion. The actual transfer is fake “ET” (not officially issued by SuperEx) to defraud user assets.

Security reminder: Please refer to the official announcement for information about platform activities.

 

[superextimmy]

SuperEx Educational Series: Understanding Privacy-preserving Computation

 

#SuperEx #EducationalSeries

Let’s talk about a topic that has actually been around for quite a long time. Maybe some people feel like they have already heard it too many times. But today, we’re going to look at it from a slightly different angle.

That topic is: privacy.

We used to say something like this in the traditional Web2 internet era: users got used to exchanging privacy for convenience.

• You hand your identity information to a platform, and the platform helps you complete registration.
• You hand your transaction data to a service provider, and the provider helps with risk control.
• You hand your behavioral data to an application, and the application recommends content to you.

This model has existed for years, and for a long time most people didn’t really question it.

But actually,

There has always been one fundamental issue behind it: Users must trust that platforms will not misuse their data, will not lose control of it after an attack or data leak, and will not expose it through third-party access.

But here comes the question:Can centralized trust really be trusted forever? And that brings us to another important question:Why does Web3 need computation that is verifiable — but does not expose everything?

Because once we enter Web3, the situation becomes more complicated.

Blockchain emphasizes transparency, openness, and verifiability. Anyone can view on-chain transactions, balance changes, contract calls, and asset movements. This transparency gives blockchain a very powerful public trust layer.

But it also creates another challenge:If everything is public, where does user privacy actually come from?

That is exactly why Privacy-preserving Computation is becoming increasingly important.

It tries to answer one key question: Can we still compute, verify, and collaborate without exposing the original data?

In other words, privacy-preserving computation is not simply about “hiding data.”

It is about allowing data to remain protected while still producing trustworthy and verifiable results.

For Web3, this may become one of the most important bridges connecting open finance, identity systems, compliance requirements, and personal privacy.

• Cick to register SuperEx
• Cick to downoad the SuperEx APP
• Cick to enter SuperEx CMC
• Cick to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

What Is Privacy-preserving Computation?

Privacy-preserving Computation is best understood as a group of technologies rather than a single technology.

Its goal is to reduce sensitive data exposure during computation while still guaranteeing that the result can be trusted.

Under traditional systems, when a platform wants to verify whether you meet certain requirements, you often need to submit raw data.

For example:

• To prove you are over 18, you may need to upload a full ID document.
• To prove you hold enough assets, you may need to reveal your wallet balance.
• To prove you passed KYC, you may need to share personal information with multiple service providers.

Privacy-preserving computation tries to change this.

Instead of revealing everything, users can simply prove: “I satisfy the requirement.”

Without needing to expose: “Here is all of my private information.”

The platform can verify the result while avoiding unnecessary access to private details.

That idea has major value across finance, healthcare, AI, digital identity, and blockchain.

Inside Web3, privacy-preserving computation usually includes several core technologies:

• Zero-Knowledge Proofs
• MPC (Multi-Party Computation)
• TEE (Trusted Execution Environments)
• FHE (Fully Homomorphic Encryption)

They solve different problems,But they all point toward the same direction: Make data usable, while keeping it as invisible as possible.

Zero-Knowledge Proofs: Proving Something Is True Without Revealing the Secret

Zero-Knowledge Proofs, often called ZK proofs, are probably the privacy technology most familiar to Web3 users.

They allow one party to prove a statement is true without revealing the exact information behind that proof.

For example: You can prove your wallet balance is above 1,000 USDT without revealing your exact balance or the rest of your portfolio.

Inside blockchain, ZK proofs usually matter in two major ways.

The first is scalability.

ZK Rollups compress large amounts of off-chain computation into a single proof, then submit that proof on-chain for verification.

The second is privacy.

Users can prove that transactions, identities, or permissions satisfy protocol rules without exposing all underlying information.

For example:

• Proving an address belongs to a compliant user
• Proving funds did not violate restrictions
• Proving someone has voting rights without revealing identity

The value of ZK proofs is powerful:

They replace “trusting a platform” with “verifying a mathematical proof.”

That fits Web3 perfectly:

Don’t trust. Verify.

MPC: Computing Together Without Sharing Full Data

MPC stands for Multi-Party Computation.

It solves another important problem: Can multiple parties complete a calculation together without revealing their raw data to each other?

For example:

Several exchanges may want to identify suspicious fund flows together, but none of them wants to expose internal user databases.

MPC allows them to calculate shared results without directly sharing private data.

In Web3, MPC has another very common use: Key management.

Traditional wallets rely on one private key.

If that private key is lost or leaked, assets may become inaccessible or stolen.

MPC wallets work differently.

Signing authority can be split into multiple key shares, without ever generating one complete private key in a single place.

Users, devices, and service providers may each hold separate fragments.

Only when required conditions are met can the signature be completed.

That changes account security from:“Protect one secret.”

Into: “Coordinate multiple participants to authorize securely.”

For exchanges, institutional custody, enterprise wallets, and large holders, MPC has already become critical infrastructure.

TEE: Computing Inside a Protected Hardware Environment

TEE stands for Trusted Execution Environment.

This approach relies on hardware-based isolation.

You can think of it like a secure room inside a computer.

Sensitive data enters that room.

The data can be processed.

But outside programs — including operating systems or cloud providers — cannot easily inspect what happens inside.

TEE offers strong performance advantages.

That makes it useful for:

• Private AI inference
• Confidential data analytics
• Trading strategy protection
• Off-chain computation verification

Of course, TEE has a different trust model than ZK proofs.

Zero-knowledge systems rely heavily on cryptographic verification.

TEE requires users to trust hardware vendors, remote attestation systems, and secure implementation.

Its advantage is efficiency.

Its limitation is that some hardware trust still remains.

In real-world systems, TEE is often combined with other privacy technologies.

For example:

• TEE handles high-performance workloads.
• ZK proofs verify important outputs.
• On-chain smart contracts complete settlement.

FHE: Computing Directly on Encrypted Data

FHE stands for Fully Homomorphic Encryption.

Among privacy technologies, it is one of the most ambitious — and one of the most exciting.

FHE allows systems to compute directly on encrypted data.

The data never needs to be decrypted during the process.

Only the final authorized user can decrypt the result.

That means a service provider can process data without ever seeing the raw content.

If mature enough, this unlocks huge possibilities.

For example:

• On-chain contracts processing encrypted balances
• AI systems analyzing encrypted datasets
• Financial institutions calculating risk together without exposing client data

The challenge is also very real:

• High computation cost
• Heavy performance overhead
• Complex development requirements

That is why FHE is attracting more attention in both Web3 and AI, but still needs more infrastructure maturity before large-scale adoption.

Its long-term vision is incredibly important: Keeping data encrypted from storage all the way through computation.

Back to the Main Question: Why Does Web3 Need Privacy-preserving Computation So Much?

Web3 has a natural contradiction.

It needs transparency.But it also needs privacy.

Transparency makes blockchain trustworthy.

Anyone can verify issuance, transactions, and contract execution.

Privacy protects users.

Because no one wants their entire balance, trading history, identity relationships, or investment strategies permanently visible to everyone.

Without privacy-preserving computation, Web3 easily becomes trapped between two extremes: Either everything is public and users lose privacy.

Or data is hidden behind centralized platforms and users lose verifiability.

Privacy-preserving computation offers a third path:

Sensitive information stays protected, while the system can still verify whether rules were followed.

That matters across many real scenarios.

• In DeFi, users may want to hide trade size and strategy while proving transactions are valid.
• In identity systems, users may want to prove eligibility without revealing full identity details.
• In compliance workflows, institutions may need to verify restrictions without permanently exposing user information on-chain.
• In AI and data marketplaces, providers may want data to be usable without allowing raw copies or leakage.
• In exchanges and custody systems, platforms may want stronger security while reducing single-key risks.

These needs are not going away.

As the industry matures, they will likely become even stronger.

Privacy Does Not Mean “No Rules”

There is also one common misunderstanding worth avoiding.

Privacy is not the same as zero regulation.

Privacy is not automatically complete anonymity.

A mature privacy system usually focuses on one core principle: Minimum disclosure.

That means only revealing the information necessary to complete a task.

Nothing more.

For example:

• A platform may only need to know whether a user comes from a restricted region — not their full address.
• A lending protocol may only need proof that collateral meets requirements — not the user’s entire asset allocation.
• A compliance system may only need to verify screening approval — not permanently store personal identity on-chain.

That kind of selective disclosure is where privacy-preserving computation becomes especially valuable.

It is not about helping bad actors avoid rules.

It is about allowing legitimate users to preserve reasonable privacy while still following rules.

What Does This Mean for SuperEx Users?

The reason SuperEx Educational Series talks about Privacy-preserving Computation is not to pull everyone deep into cryptography theory.

It is to help users understand where next-generation crypto infrastructure is heading.

Future crypto trading, wallets, identity systems, asset management, and compliance frameworks will increasingly rely on privacy-preserving technologies.

Users should not be forced to choose between convenience and privacy.And they should not constantly compromise between transparency and security.

For everyday crypto users, this means three things.

First, wallets and accounts are likely to become safer.

Technologies like MPC and threshold signatures can reduce risks caused by a single private key.

Second, on-chain interaction may become much more private.

Zero-knowledge systems, encrypted computation, and privacy smart contracts could allow users to transact and verify without exposing everything.

Third, platforms may become much better at verifiable compliance.

Users may prove eligibility without repeatedly handing over excessive personal information.

This also aligns with SuperEx’s long-term focus on user education.

A mature crypto user should not only pay attention to price movements.

It also matters to understand how security, privacy, identity, and infrastructure shape the market together.

Privacy-preserving Computation is no longer a distant concept.

It is becoming one of the key conditions for Web3 to move from early open experimentation toward large-scale adoption.

A truly sustainable crypto financial system cannot rely only on transparency.And it also cannot simply hand all privacy over to centralized platforms.

It needs something smarter: What should be verified can still be verified.

What should stay protected remains protected.

And that is exactly why privacy-preserving computation matters.

[superextimmy]

SuperEx Guide: SuperEx FAQ

 

#SuperEx #Guide #FAQ

This article is intended to provide SuperEx users with solutions and guidance for common issues they may encounter while using the platform, including network errors, download failures, and other related problems. If you experience an issue that is not covered in this article, please feel free to contact our 24/7 customer support team at any time.

• Cick to register SuperEx
• Cick to downoad the SuperEx APP
• Cick to enter SuperEx CMC
• Cick to enter SuperEx DAO Academy — Space

 

Network Error 1000S Code

If you log in to SuperEx.com and get a network error, it is caused by the network in your region, which is related to the laws of your country or region. To solve this problem, please ensure that the network in your region can normally access the SuperEx server, and the SuperEx service is set up on AWS global nodes.

However, the corresponding laws and regulations of some countries still do not allow access to services such as AWS or Google. If you use a proxy to log in to the official website and it still prompts you that there is a network error, please try to change your proxy access IP.

If you have any questions, please add SuperEx Telegram customer service or contact our online customer service. Thank you for supporting SuperEx.com.

Unable to register

Sorry, SuperEx is temporarily not open for registration in your area.

Google Authenticator Verification Error Solution

some users experienced an error in the verification code when using Google Authenticator to bind their SuperEx account. If you have an error when entering the Google 2FA verification code, we recommend you to refer to the following methods:

1. If the Google Authenticator on your mobile phone is bound to multiple accounts, please make sure to enter the 2FA verification code corresponding to the SuperEx account email address;

2. Please make sure to install the correct Google AuthenticatorAPP, iOS — Authenticator, Android — Authenticator;

3. Each 2FA verification code is only valid for 30 seconds, please be sure to enter and submit within 30 seconds, the timeout will cause the verification code to become invalid
4. Please make sure the mobile phone time is the same as the standard time of your time zone.

How to set standard time in iOS:

1. The mobile phone needs to be connected to the Internet;

 

2. Settings -> General -> Date and Time -> Confirm the time zone is correct -> Enable automatic settings;

How to set standard time in Android:

1.Open Google Authenticator and click the “Menu” button in the upper right corner:

 

2.Click “Settings” to enter the setting interface:

 

3. Click “Time correction for codes”:

 

4. Click “Sync now” and wait for a while

 

Note:

1. For binding Google Authenticator, please refer to: How to bind Google Authenticator (WEB)
2. If the above three solutions can be ruled out and the Google verification code is still invalid, you can also use the key you saved to re-bind on the Google server.
3. If the original Google Authenticator is lost, you need to apply to unbind the Google Authenticator first.

You can unbind it by sending an email with your account info to our SuperEx support team official email: [email protected] , please use the email you registered on our platform. The SuperEx staff will work it out within two days when we get your application.
The account information we need you to provide are as follows:

1. Account information (UID)
2. Registered Email
3. Mobile phone number (if you haven’t bound mobile number before, then it is not included);
4. The confirmation screenshot proof of deposit source, which should contain your deposit address in our platform and TXID, not from SuperEx or blockchain explorer but the sending platform. (if your account has never made deposit before, then it is not included);
5. Content: I apply to unbind the Google Authenticator or Email or Phone number.