All Activity

Спасибо за бонус *0x75aDa375f8e4* + 0.3 USDT - Dec-03-2025 03:26:17 PM UTC 0x850f01483c00b33767adcb8cfb8cd6c563cfcb3fbf73bff6f1fcdda041fadde4 Примечание: Викторина в чате Profit-Hunters BIZ

Last week wasn't good for others due to the volatility BTC encountered, but I dare say the market treated me well ngl. I was looking for opportunities to pass the time and came across a fun, crazy initiative. I joined the 48-hour crazy competition, gave it my best, climbed the leaderboard, and earned 50 BGB. It was the shortest competition I've ever participated in You know I’m jumping right back in for another run(phase2) with DMC, I'll try to go up the leaderboard board on this. What's your strategies in competitions like these? https://www.bitget.com/launchhub/trading-club/232742

In early November, a major ripple quietly slammed into parts of DeFi — a ripple starting at an automated market maker and ending at a “stablecoin vault” used by yield‑seeking depositors. What unfolded was not a hack of the vault itself, but a failure of composability. This is what happened The Trigger: A Rounding Bug at Balancer On November 3, 2025, Balancer V2’s “Composable Stable Pools” were exploited via a subtle rounding error in a batch‑swap function. That bug allowed attackers to drain liquidity across multiple stable pools. Estimates of the exploited value range around US$116 – 128 million across several chains. Because Balancer’s V2 uses a shared vault architecture, the exploit didn’t just compromise one pool, it affected all pools using that vault design across networks. A Stablecoin Caught in the Crossfire — USDX / sUSDX via Stables Labs & Silo Finance One of the impacted assets was USDX / sUSDX, a stablecoin ecosystem managed by Stables Labs. Reports quickly followed that roughly US$1 million in USDX‑related liquidity was lost as a result of the Balancer exploit, liquidity providers began withdrawing, and the pool underpinning USDX on certain chains began to collapse. In response, Stables Labs announced a “USDX Restoration Arrangement,” aiming to recover or restructure the stablecoin’s backing. But as liquidity vanished, market confidence dropped and USDX began to trade at a substantial discount to its peg. Meanwhile, lending markets that used USDX/sUSDX as collateral, including a market at Silo Finance found themselves exposed. The collapse of liquidity and loss of peg compromised the underlying collateral value. How a Vault That Looked “Safe” Turned Risky; The Lazy Summer USDC Vault Exposure The vaults run by Lazy Summer Protocol, their design automated, diversified, and conservative. Vaults allocate capital to a mix of markets aiming for yield while spreading out risk. But one of those allocations into the Silo USDX/sUSDX market on Arbitrum turned out to be the weak link. According to a public DAO proposal, roughly US$1.48 million of vault capital was in that Silo market, out of a total vault size of about US$9.8 million on Arbitrum. When Silo’s underlying collateral (USDX/sUSDX) lost value and liquidity, the lending market collapsed. But because Silo’s on‑chain oracle feed for USDX apparently continued to (incorrectly) report full peg and full collateralization, the vault’s on‑chain accounting didn’t mark any losses. The vault continued to show a “healthy” balance even as real value drained. That mismatch allowed withdrawals at full nominal value draining the vault’s liquidity and left remaining depositors with impaired (or illiquid) positions. This wasn’t a bug in Lazy Summer’s contracts, it was a data‑dependency failure in a composability chain. Aftermath — Governance, Recovery Proposals, and Community Pressure When the impact became visible, the community around Lazy Summer took swift action: The DAO formally proposed removing the Silo USDX/sUSDX market from the vault strategy set. The suggestion also includes implementing “trusted guardians”, mechanisms allowing faster emergency intervention if a strategy shows signs of systemic risk. According to community disclosures, the vault’s deposit/exposure caps were set to zero for the risky strategy, stopping further capital inflows. In public communication, Summer.fi recognized the issue originated upstream (Balancer → USDX → Silo) and that the vault was indirectly affected. What This Incident Teaches From an outsider’s perspective, the Arbitrum USDC Vault collapse is a cautionary tale with broader implications: Audit does not equate invulnerability. Balancer had undergone multiple audits, yet a math‑precision bug still slipped through. Composability multiplies systemic risk. When one protocol fails, even at a low level (pool logic, rounding, etc.) the consequences can cascade across stablecoins, lending markets, yield vaults, and end users. On‑chain accounting depends on oracles and collateral‑valuations — but those can be wrong. Vaults that rely solely on on‑chain data assume those data feeds remain accurate. When they don’t — there’s no manual safety net built in. Risk management must include governance, emergency controls, and transparency — not just audits. The DAO’s “guardian + offboarding + cap” proposals are a step toward building that kind of resilience. The Arbitrum USDC Vault incident highlights the importance of transparency, reliable data, and proactive risk management in DeFi. Summer.fi continues to support its community by providing clear, real-time insights into vault strategies, risk exposure, and recovery updates. To stay up to date and make informed decisions, visit summer.fi

The Arbitrum USDC Vault — What Really Went Down, and What the Future Looks Like In early November, a major ripple quietly slammed into parts of DeFi — a ripple starting at an automated market maker and ending at a “stablecoin vault” used by yield‑seeking depositors. What unfolded was not a hack of the vault itself, but a failure of composability. This is what happened The Trigger: A Rounding Bug at Balancer On November 3, 2025, Balancer V2’s “Composable Stable Pools” were exploited via a subtle rounding error in a batch‑swap function. That bug allowed attackers to drain liquidity across multiple stable pools. Estimates of the exploited value range around US$116 – 128 million across several chains. Because Balancer’s V2 uses a shared vault architecture, the exploit didn’t just compromise one pool, it affected all pools using that vault design across networks. A Stablecoin Caught in the Crossfire — USDX / sUSDX via Stables Labs & Silo Finance One of the impacted assets was USDX / sUSDX, a stablecoin ecosystem managed by Stables Labs. Reports quickly followed that roughly US$1 million in USDX‑related liquidity was lost as a result of the Balancer exploit, liquidity providers began withdrawing, and the pool underpinning USDX on certain chains began to collapse. In response, Stables Labs announced a “USDX Restoration Arrangement,” aiming to recover or restructure the stablecoin’s backing. But as liquidity vanished, market confidence dropped and USDX began to trade at a substantial discount to its peg. Meanwhile, lending markets that used USDX/sUSDX as collateral, including a market at Silo Finance found themselves exposed. The collapse of liquidity and loss of peg compromised the underlying collateral value. How a Vault That Looked “Safe” Turned Risky; The Lazy Summer USDC Vault Exposure The vaults run by Lazy Summer Protocol, their design automated, diversified, and conservative. Vaults allocate capital to a mix of markets aiming for yield while spreading out risk. But one of those allocations into the Silo USDX/sUSDX market on Arbitrum turned out to be the weak link. According to a public DAO proposal, roughly US$1.48 million of vault capital was in that Silo market, out of a total vault size of about US$9.8 million on Arbitrum. When Silo’s underlying collateral (USDX/sUSDX) lost value and liquidity, the lending market collapsed. But because Silo’s on‑chain oracle feed for USDX apparently continued to (incorrectly) report full peg and full collateralization, the vault’s on‑chain accounting didn’t mark any losses. The vault continued to show a “healthy” balance even as real value drained. That mismatch allowed withdrawals at full nominal value draining the vault’s liquidity and left remaining depositors with impaired (or illiquid) positions. This wasn’t a bug in Lazy Summer’s contracts, it was a data‑dependency failure in a composability chain. Aftermath — Governance, Recovery Proposals, and Community Pressure When the impact became visible, the community around Lazy Summer took swift action: The DAO formally proposed removing the Silo USDX/sUSDX market from the vault strategy set. The suggestion also includes implementing “trusted guardians”, mechanisms allowing faster emergency intervention if a strategy shows signs of systemic risk. According to community disclosures, the vault’s deposit/exposure caps were set to zero for the risky strategy, stopping further capital inflows. In public communication, Summer.fi recognized the issue originated upstream (Balancer → USDX → Silo) and that the vault was indirectly affected. What This Incident Teaches From an outsider’s perspective, the Arbitrum USDC Vault collapse is a cautionary tale with broader implications: Audit does not equate invulnerability. Balancer had undergone multiple audits, yet a math‑precision bug still slipped through. Composability multiplies systemic risk. When one protocol fails, even at a low level (pool logic, rounding, etc.) the consequences can cascade across stablecoins, lending markets, yield vaults, and end users. On‑chain accounting depends on oracles and collateral‑valuations — but those can be wrong. Vaults that rely solely on on‑chain data assume those data feeds remain accurate. When they don’t — there’s no manual safety net built in. Risk management must include governance, emergency controls, and transparency — not just audits. The DAO’s “guardian + offboarding + cap” proposals are a step toward building that kind of resilience. The Arbitrum USDC Vault incident highlights the importance of transparency, reliable data, and proactive risk management in DeFi. Summer.fi continues to support its community by providing clear, real-time insights into vault strategies, risk exposure, and recovery updates. To stay up to date and make informed decisions, visit summer.fi

Спасибо! 0.10 USDT Dec-03-2025 03:26:17 PM UTC 0x850f01483c00b33767adcb8cfb8cd6c563cfcb3fbf73bff6f1fcdda041fadde4 Примечание: Викторина в чате Profit-Hunters BIZ

Спасибо за викторину! +0.10 USDT 0x850f01483c00b33767adcb8cfb8cd6c563cfcb3fbf73bff6f1fcdda041fadde4 Dec-03-2025 03:26:17 PM Викторина в чате Profit-Hunters BIZ

+9 bsc-usd 0x842778eb760749436e9b70964f0eed3e19c073279a8f7048b3e15712c5acd05f Dec-02-2025 10:59:36 AM UTC. RBC from Profit-Hunters. Loanledger.

Red folder news almost shake the markets with lot of volatilities, i however suggest mainly to watch the markets dancing during the said news releases and one they get settled then to look for any setups.

Спасибо за полезную викторину! 0x4C0ec75B56e1974************************* 0.3 USDT - Dec-03-2025 03:26:17 PM UTC 0x850f01483c00b33767adcb8cfb8cd6c563cfcb3fbf73bff6f1fcdda041fadde4

Спасибо за бонус +0.2 usdt bep20 0x01bdcf1067e995e9bfb26bef836f36f4a2c5371fd45ad9c57682823e6ea54a9f 2.12.2025 19:33:33 Примечание: викторина в чате Profit Hunter

Polygon shows obvious signs when the bear market arrives. Usually MATIC moves steady, but during a bear season, it behaves like it’s walking on slippery floors. Prices drop slowly but consistently. When you open Polygon on #BingXSpot and the chart looks like a slide, you instantly know the bear is awake. Another sign is when MATIC holders start pretending not to care. They say things like I’m long term now or price doesn’t matter, even though they refresh every hour. Bear markets also make Polygon’s small pumps feel suspicious, like traps. Every green candle gets side eyed because people expect another dip. Polygon communities become quiet and serious, shifting from hype to let’s survive. Not financial advice, just honest trader reality. What sign from Polygon tells you the bear market has really started?

Thanks! Ваш депозит успешно подтвержден. Сумма депозита：0.3 USDT Вид сети：BSC (BEP20) Адрес получения：***************7d8f88f0c8b 0x850f01483c00b33767adcb8cfb8cd6c563cfcb3fbf73bff6f1fcdda041fadde4 Время подтверждения：2025-12-03 15:27:11(UTC) Викторина в чате Profit-Hunters biz

Спасибо за бонус 0xf33ce1e85c262a2c8be + 0.1 USDT - Dec-03 2025 17:26 PM UTC 0x850f01483c00b33767adcb8cfb8cd6c563cfcb3fbf73bff6f1fcdda041fadde4 Викторина

Спасибо за бонус! +0.1 USDT *******8c054424Dc8cB2 0x850f01483c00b33767adcb8cfb8cd6c563cfcb3fbf73bff6f1fcdda041fadde4 Dec-03-2025 03:26:17 PM UTC Викторина в чате Profit-Hunters BIZ

Thanks for a bonus! 0xe1cb8778C6000******************* 0.2 USDT - Dec-03-2025 03:26:17 PM 0x850f01483c00b33767adcb8cfb8cd6c563cfcb3fbf73bff6f1fcdda041fadde4 Comment: Викторина в чате Profit-Hunters BIZ.

+0.2 usdt Dec-02-2025 05:33:11 PM UTC 0xd33A265054a6dcB50ab8c6770&** 0x01bdcf1067e995e9bfb26bef836f36f4a2c5371fd45ad9c57682823e6ea54a9f Викторина в чате Profit-Hunters biz Спасибки 🤗

My Payment #29

Again $150 Usdt instantly gotten so much love - investdubai.cloud Proof - https://tronscan.org/#/transaction/5a77f7c7d351751bd5c5fe413851457e562576a28be4153044b8073a22819cb3

Some market days feel like background noise muted, predictable, and almost forgettable. But then a moment comes when the market breathes differently. Bitcoin’s buy-to-sell momentum just pushed to 1.17, a level we haven’t seen since early 2023. No big announcements. No sudden frenzy. Just a quiet shift in demand, the type that usually precedes something more meaningful. Across the landscape, activity felt… sharper. Fresh projects surfacing, liquidity moving with more intention, and GAIX’s listing event on BingX pulling attention simply because 625,000 GAIX in potential rewards is hard to ignore. Today didn’t behave like an ordinary listing day. It felt like traders were probing the edges again testing depth, testing sentiment. If large holders are moving quietly and retail is awakening, what exactly is this early tremor trying to tell us? Could this be the first hint of a much bigger move taking shape?

I focus on what kind of content I enjoy creating and what makes me feel comfortable. One platform felt way more interactive for me, while the other gave me more control.

"Instant verification" - we hear it more often than “Hello” We look forward to everyone with interesting challenges: Rendering|Soules (@soules_service) News & Giveaways: Channel|Soules (@SoulesPlanet_Bot)

I was curious about how fairness actually worked under the hood, and after testing a few platforms myself, I found PGLUCKY88 pretty solid. You can use the hash check method before and after each bet to see that nothing’s being tampered with. I tried verifying a few results and the numbers matched every time, which gave me more peace of mind before placing bigger bets.

I usually go for the free spins because sometimes they lead to decent wins without using my own credits. On Mega888 apk, I had a session where free spins actually triggered a bonus round that paid better than my normal bets. It doesn’t always work like that, but I figure if they’re free, there’s really nothing to lose, and occasionally they do better than expected.

I’ve used Primedice for a few months now and it’s pretty solid for quick bets, especially with how fast the crypto deposits are. It reminds me a bit of a non gamstop casino where limits aren’t as tight and you get more freedom with how you play. Just keep an eye on your balance—it’s easy to lose track when the rolls go fast.

I tried the quiz and thought it was pretty spot on with the suggestions. One of the options it gave me turned out to be a top rated AUS bitcoin casino, which I’ve been using for a few weeks now. The games run smooth, payouts are quick, and I like how they handle crypto deposits. Definitely made things easier picking it through that quiz instead of scrolling through random lists.